Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Rist, Pamela M.a; b; c; * | Marden, Jessica R.b | Capistrant, Benjamin D.d; e | Wu, Qiongf | Glymour, M. Mariab; g
Affiliations: [a] Division of Preventive Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA | [b] Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA | [c] Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA | [d] Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA | [e] Minnesota Population Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA | [f] Institute of Social Science Survey, Peking University, Peking, China | [g] Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, USA
Correspondence: [*] Correspondence to: Pamela M. Rist, 900 Commonwealth Avenue, 3rd floor, Boston, MA 02215, USA. Tel.: +1 617 278 0835; Fax: +1 617 731 3843; E-mail: prist@mail.harvard.edu.
Abstract: Background:Individual-level modifiers can delay onset of limitations in basic activities of daily living (ADLs) among cognitively impaired individuals. We assessed whether these modifiers also delayed onset of limitations in instrumental ADLs (IADLs) among individuals at elevated dementia risk. Objectives:To determine whether modifiable individual-level factors delay incident IADL limitations among adults stratified by dementia risk. Methods:Health and Retirement Study participants aged 65+ without activity limitations in 1998 or 2000 (n = 5,219) were interviewed biennially through 2010. Dementia probability, categorized in quartiles, was used to predict incident IADL limitations with Poisson regression. We estimated relative (risk ratio) and absolute (number of limitations) effects from models including dementia, individual-level modifiers (physical inactivity, smoking, no alcohol consumption, and depression) and interaction terms between dementia and individual-level modifiers. Results:Dementia probability quartile predicted incident IADL limitations (relative risk for highest versus lowest quartile = 0.44; 95% CI: 0.28–0.70). Most modifiers did not significantly increase risk of IADL limitations among the cognitively impaired. Physical inactivity (RR = 1.60; 95% CI: 1.16, 2.19) increased the risk of IADL limitations among the cognitively impaired. The interaction between physical inactivity and low dementia probability was statistically significant (p = 0.009) indicating that physical inactivity had significantly larger effects on incident IADLs among cognitively normal than among those with high dementia probability. Conclusion:Physical activity may protect against IADL limitations while not smoking, alcohol consumption, and not being depressed do not afford substantial protection among the cognitively impaired. Results highlight the need for extra support for IADLs among individuals with cognitive losses.
Keywords: Cognition, disability, epidemiology
DOI: 10.3233/JAD-141866
Journal: Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 1171-1180, 2015
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl