Affiliations: Department of Systems Innovation, School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
Correspondence:
[*]
Corresponding author: Teruaki Hayashi, Department of Systems Innovation, School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8656, Japan. Tel.: +81 3 5841 2908; E-mail:teru-h.884@nifty.com
Abstract: Action Planning is a workshop method for creating strategic scenarios of
actions. Through the process of Action Planning, ideas of data utilization
are grounded into feasible plans, i.e., scenarios, by adding related
elements (stakeholders, data, analysis methods, etc.). Here, participants
resolve conflicts and reduce risks in actions through the process of
externalizing and serializing elements. Through the process that a
participant constructs a scenario, when he/she notices the scenario
inconsistent, he/she has to reject or modify the part of hypotheses where
the conflict occurs. In this study, we discuss Conflict Resolution Behaviors
(CRBs) and the derivation of related knowledge in the process of scenario
generation by tracking the handwriting of groups and individuals. In
conclusion, the inconsistency of scenarios may occur more frequently in the
process of individuals. In the scenario generating process of groups, it is
considered that conflict resolutions in the early stage of scenario
generation reduce the occurrence of conflicts in the latter stage of
scenario generation. The results suggest that an individual decision maker
can generate a scenario equivalent to a scenario generated in groups, when
he/she takes into account reworking costs due to inconsistency of scenarios.
Keywords: Market of data, scenario, handwriting, Innovators Marketplace
