Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Khobragade, Anish Rajkumara; * | Ghumbre, Shashikant U.b
Affiliations: [a] College of Engineering Pune, Savitribai Phule Pune University, Pune, India | [b] Government College of Engineering and Research, Avasari Khurd, Savitribai Phule Pune University, Pune, India
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: Anish Rajkumar Khobragade, College of Engineering Pune, Savitribai Phule Pune University, Pune, India. E-mail: anishraj.comp@coep.ac.in.
Abstract: Knowledge Graph (KG) is the network which contains some topic-based entities, called nodes, and the associated information among the entities. Here, the concept in the knowledge graph is denoted by the tuple relationship, such that the ⟨entity1, predicate, entity2⟩. The entity in the knowledge graph is the abstract concepts based on the particular object, namely the organization, dataset, people, and some associated documentation. The big issue in the KG is that it consists of some incomplete information. The missing details can be identified by employing the knowledge graph completion (KGC) solution. KGC is the same as the link prediction concepts in the knowledge graphs. However, this concept is more complex that it does not predict the link relationship among the nodes but also the diversified information from the link relations. Hence this survey analyzes different methods of link prediction techniques, and this review provides a detailed review of 50 research papers concentrating on various methods, like embedding-based methods, deep learning methods, knowledge acquisition methods, ranking methods, and representation learning methods. The analysis is carried out with respect to the survey based on the publication year, research techniques, performance measures, dataset, toolset and achievement of the research methodologies. Also, the problems in the methods are explained in the research gaps and issues. Furthermore, the future extent of these research works is done based on the limitations identified from the existing research methods.
Keywords: Knowledge graphs, link prediction, representation learning, reasoning and learning, embedding
DOI: 10.3233/IDT-210103
Journal: Intelligent Decision Technologies, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 653-663, 2022
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl