Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Awwad, Elie | Mabsout, Mounir | Sadek, Salah | Tarhini, Kassim
Affiliations: Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, American University of Beirut, Lebanon | General Manager and Structural Engineer, Tarhini and Associates, East Lyme, CT 06333, USA
Note: [] Corresponding author. Email: mounir@aub.edu.lb
Abstract: This paper presents the results of a parametric study of load distribution in 108 four-sided precast concrete box culverts using three-dimensional finite element analysis (FEA) and two-dimensional plane frame analysis. Three concrete box culvert sizes were chosen with various span lengths, constant rise, and standard laying width. The culverts are subjected to various combinations of earth loading from the soil cover, lateral earth pressure, and AASHTO HS20 wheel loading applied at centre or edge along midspan of the top slab. As the soil cover increases from 0 to 3 m (10 ft), wheel loads are projected to the top slab using ASTM C890 procedure. Maximum bending moments and deflections were computed and evaluated. As expected, the study showed that the effect of wheel loading along midspan is significant and that the edge loading condition for a single box is more critical than centre loading for soil cover less than 0.9 m (3 ft). The earth loading tends to gradually dominate as the soil cover increases, which is expected based on geotechnical engineering practices. The effect of wheel loading position along midspan (edge vs centre) for soil cover greater than 2.1 m (7 ft) is negligible. It was shown that the plane frame analysis and 3D FEA gave similar results for long-span culverts. However, for short-span (3.6 m or 12 ft) concrete box culverts, the plane frame analysis was less conservative than the 3D FEA by about 15% and 25% for moments and deflections, respectively; versus about 5% and 10% for the long-span culvert (7.2 m or 24 ft) considered.
Keywords: concrete box culverts, finite element analysis, earth pressure, wheel loading, AASHTO, ASTM
DOI: 10.1080/15732480802180791
Journal: Bridge Structures, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 99-107, 2008
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl