Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Perner, P.; | Rapp, A. | Dressler, C. | Wollweber, L. | Beuthan, J. | Greulich, K.O. | Hausmann, M.;
Affiliations: Department Single Cell and Single Molecule Techniques, Institute of Molecular Biotechnology e.V., P.O. Box 100813, D‐07708 Jena, Germany | Institute for Medical Physics and Laser Medicine, Free University Berlin, University Hospital Benjamin Franklin, Fabeckstr. 60‐62, D‐14195 Berlin, Germany | Present address: Kirchhoff‐Institute of Physics, University of Heidelberg, Albert‐Ueberle‐Str. 3‐5, D‐69120 Heidelberg, Germany
Note: [] Corresponding author: Dr. B. Perner, Institute of Molecular Biotechnology e.V., P.O. Box 100813, D‐07708 Jena, Germany. Tel.: +49 3641 656405; Fax: +49 3641 656410; E‐mail: perner@imb‐jena.de.
Abstract: The response of single breast cancer cells (cell line T‐47D) to 17β‐estradiol (E2) under different concentrations was studied by using an instrument that allows to combine far‐field light microscopy with high resolution scanning near‐field (AFM/SNOM) microscopy on the same cell. Different concentrations of E2 induce clearly different effects as well on cellular shape (in classical bright‐field imaging) as on surface topography (atomic force imaging) and absorbance (near‐field light transmission imaging). The differences range from a polygonal shape at zero via a roughly spherical shape at physiological up to a spindle‐like shape at un‐physiologically high concentrations. The surface topography of untreated control cells was found to be regular and smooth with small overall height modulations. At physiological E2 concentrations the surfaces became increasingly jagged as detected by an increase in membrane height. After application of the un‐physiological high E2 concentration the cell surface structures appeared to be smoother again with an irregular fine structure. The general behaviour of dose dependent differences was also found in the near‐field light transmission images. In order to quantify the treatment effects, line scans through the normalised topography images were drawn and a rate of co‐localisation between high topography and high transmission areas was calculated. The cell biological aspects of these observations are, so far, not studied in detail but measurements on single cells offer new perspectives to be empirically used in diagnosis and therapy control of breast cancers.
Keywords: Light microscopy, scanning near‐field optical microscopy (SNOM), transmission light SNOM, breast cancer cells, cell surface response, estrogen (17β‐estradiol) treatment
Journal: Analytical Cellular Pathology, vol. 24, no. 2-3, pp. 89-100, 2002
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl