Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Issue title: Case Based Reasoning
Guest editors: Belén Díaz Agudo and Ashok Goel
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Chen, Lia; * | Wang, Fenga | Pu, Pearlb
Affiliations: [a] Department of Computer Science, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, China. E-mails: lichen@comp.hkbu.edu.hk, fwang@comp.hkbu.edu.hk | [b] Human Computer Interaction Group, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland. E-mail: pearl.pu@epfl.ch
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author. E-mail: lichen@comp.hkbu.edu.hk.
Abstract: Recommender systems have increasingly become popular in various web environments (such as e-commerce and social media) for automatically generating items that match to individual users’ personal interests. Among different types of recommender systems that have been developed so far, critiquing-based recommender systems have been widely recognized as an effective approach to obtaining users’ feedback on the system’s generated recommendations. Such systems have been demonstrated particularly helpful for serving new users. That is, by means of eliciting and refining their preferences through real-item feedback, the system is able to gradually improve its recommendation accuracy and aid users to make better decision. However, how to precisely acquire users’ critiquing feedback is still a challenging issue. Most of existing systems rely on users to specify the feedback on their own, which unavoidably let users consume extra efforts. In our work, we have been engaged in analyzing users’ eye-movement behavior when they evaluate recommendations, with the objective of identifying the correlation between eye movements and their critiquing feedback. The results can hence be constructive for developing an eye-based feedback elicitation method, so as to reduce users’ self-critiquing efforts. Based on a collection of real users’ eye-gaze data, we have tested this idea’s feasibility. Moreover, we have compared different recommendation interfaces (the interface that displays a set of recommended products), and found the category layout performs better than the list structure in terms of stimulating users to view recommended products. As a result, multiple design guidelines are derived from our user experiment.
Keywords: Recommender systems, critiquing feedback, eye movements, fixation metrics, feedback elicitation
DOI: 10.3233/AIC-170737
Journal: AI Communications, vol. 30, no. 3-4, pp. 207-222, 2017
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl