Experiences of occupational physicians with the implementation of indicated prevention for long term sickness absence

Issue title: Special Section: The International Classification of Function (ICF) in Occupational Health

Guest editors: IJmert Kant and Ludovic G.P.M. van Amelsvoort

Article type: Research Article

Authors: de Brouwer, Carin P.M.^{a; *} | Verdonk, Petra^b | van Amelsvoort, Ludovic G.P.M.^a | Jansen, Nicole W.H.^a | Kant, IJmert^a | Widdershoven, Guy A.M.^b

Affiliations: [a] Department of Epidemiology, CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands | [b] Department of Medical Humanities, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Correspondence: [*] Address for correspondence: Carin de Brouwer, Department of Epidemiology, Maastricht University, PO-box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands. Tel.: +31 43 3882375; Fax: +31 43 3884128; E-mail: carin.debrouwer@maastrichtuniversity.nl.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Functioning including work participation, is an emerging challenge in occupational health. The prevention of long term sickness absence (LTSA) through a strategy involving screening and structured early consultation (preventive strategy) was proven effective and can address participation issues. Implementation of this strategy has proven difficult. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to investigate the experiences of occupational physicians (OPs) delivering a structured early consultation to office workers, in order to enhance implementation of the strategy. METHODS: In this case study, a mixed method design was used. Interviews and surveys were conducted to obtain an in-depth picture of OPs experiences. RESULTS: Factors hindering implementation in relation to the OPs were difficulties in communicating the risk of future sick leave, prioritization of other tasks, maintaining a reactive approach due to work pressure, preference for prevention on the level of the work environment, privacy issues related to labeling workers to have mental or psychosocial issues, and the biomedical model being the mental model in use. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of the preventive strategy seems to require a more profound focus on the biopsychosocial approach. Training of relevant skills is important to achieve a focus on prevention and fostering health over the lifespan.

Keywords: Process evaluation, case study, preventive strategy, occupational health, screening

DOI: 10.3233/WOR-172547

Journal: Work, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 157-172, 2017