Affiliations: [a] JimConna Inc., Carbondale, CO, USA
| [b] Faculty of Industrial Design Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
Correspondence:
[*]
Address for correspondence: Conne Bazley, 5966 County Road 109, Carbondale, CO 81623, USA. Tel.: +1 970 618 5895; E-mail: cbazley@yahoo.com and Peter Vink, University of Technology, Landbergstraat 15, 2628 CE Delft, The Netherlands. Tel.: +31 15 278 14 38; Fax: +31 15 2787179; E-mail: p.vink@tudelft.nl.
Note: [1] Sounding board is a discussion paper intended to evoke reader response-to-the-editors.
Abstract: This paper discusses the importance of including time in environmental design and the challenges facing environmental design now and in the future. Research shows that important factors for studying the effects of environments are time, body movement, control and sensory variability. There are many ways to incorporate time into the design and it is dependent on the type of environmental design. Research also suggests that discomfort in restrictive environments, e.g., in an airplane or automobile are strongly related long periods of inactivity and lack of sensory stimulation. Research also suggests that office workers’ health risks are in a large part due to restrictive movement, training inefficiencies, and lack of variation found in the environment. A challenge is how to incorporate stimulating activities and variation into restrictive environments. Another challenge is the cost versus benefit of designing comfortable and healthy environments. Will comfort standards be accomplished through volunteer compliance or is it necessary to push for compliance through legal requirements, standards and regulations? Is it time to consider reducing discomfort as a necessity and apply what research has suggested, i.e., that variation and movement over time in interior environments promotes well-being and productivity? Is it time to accept the results of research and apply the findings to the designs and practice of environmental design?
