Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Issue title: Special Section: Complimentary Medicine for Work, Function and Health
Guest editors: Valerie J. Berg Rice
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Genc, Ezgia; * | Bulut, Iremb
Affiliations: [a] Department of Therapy and Rehabilitation, Vocational School of Health Services, Fırat University, Elazig, Turkey | [b] Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Fırat University, Elazig, Turkey
Correspondence: [*] Address for correspondence: Ezgi Genc, PT, PhD, Department of Therapy and Rehabilitation, Vocational School of Health Services, Fýrat University, Elazig, Turkey. E-mail: eyarasir@firat.edu.tr; ORCID: 0000-0002-2065-1703.
Note: [1] Note: Part of this study was presented as an oral presentation under the title “Usage of Traditional and Complementary Medicine Practices by Cancer Patients and Affecting Factors” at the 6th International Health Science and Life Congress, Burdur, 2023.
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Complementary and alternative medicines (CAM) are being uses more often with cancer patients. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate attitudes, use and influencing factors of CAM among cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: This descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted on 407 cancer patients in Turkey. The study was conducted during July-September 2021 using a Questionnaire that included a Complementary, Alternative and Conventional Medicine Attitude Scale (CACMAS). Pearson’s Chi-Squared Test, Mann-Whitney U, Kruskal Wallis, and logistic regression were all utilized. RESULTS: The findings revealed that 76.2% of the participants stated that they used CAM methods while undergoing cancer treatment, and 65.2% of those who did so kept from sharing this information to medical professionals. Phytotherapy was the most common CAM method used by patients. The use of CAM was found to be significantly higher among those who were 55–64 years of age, married, secondary school graduates, non-smokers, CAM users before their cancer diagnosis, and who had a family history of cancer (p < 0.05). The participants’ average CACMAS scores were 112.20±16.53. Among those who used CAM during treatment, non-smoking, overweight-obese participants had higher CACMAS scores (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Due to the high prevalence of CAM usage among cancer patients and possible interaction effects with chemotherapy medications, it is important for healthcare professionals to assess and educate cancer patients regarding CAM use. Additional research is needed to determine potential interactions, as well as pros and cons of CAM use during cancer treatment.
Keywords: Attitude, complementary therapies, COVID-19, neoplasms, patients, phytotherapy, traditional medicine
DOI: 10.3233/WOR-230195
Journal: Work, vol. 78, no. 4, pp. 1161-1172, 2024
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl