Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Beltrán, Sol Patriciaa; b | Batista, Gabriel de Amorimb; * | dos Passos, Muana Hiandra Pereirab | da Silva, Hitalo Andradeb | Locks, Franciscoc; d | Cappato de Araújo, Rodrigob; c; d
Affiliations: [a] Universidad Santiago de Cali, Cali, Columbia | [b] Associated Graduate Program in Physical Education UPE/UFPB, University of Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil | [c] Department of Physical Therapy, University of Pernambuco, Petrolina, Brazil | [d] Graduate Program in Rehabilitation and Functional Performance (PPGRDF), University of Pernambuco, Petrolina, Brazil
Correspondence: [*] Address for correspondence: Gabriel de Amorim Batista, Arnóbio Marquês, 310- Santo Amaro, Recife - PE, Cep: 50100130, Brazil. E-mails: gabriel.amorimbatista@upe.br and gabriel_amorimbatista@hotmail.com.
Abstract: BACKGROUND:Shoulder pain affects millions of workers worldwide and is considered one of the leading causes of absenteeism and presenteeism. Therefore, using exercises in the work environment emerges as a strategy to prevent or reduce shoulder pain. OBJECTIVE:The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of a workplace-based exercise program on shoulder pain and function in fruit workers. METHODS:This was an 8-week parallel two-arm randomized controlled trial. Forty-four fruit workers who reported chronic shoulder pain were randomized to an Experimental Group (EG) or Control Group (CG). The EG was submitted to a program of resistance and stretching exercises for eight weeks, twice a week. The CG received a booklet with muscle stretching and mobility exercises. The primary outcome was shoulder pain intensity; the secondary outcomes were Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) and perceived global effect. RESULTS:Both groups showed reductions in pain intensity EG: 4.26 (95% CI 2.78–5.74) and CG: 3.74 (95% CI 1.98–5.50) points. The SPADI results showed an average reduction of 17.76 (CI 95% 3.10–32.43) for the EG and 18.39 (CI 95% 3.66–33.13) for the CG. The mean value of the perceived global effect for the CG was 3.45±2.01, and for the EG, the mean was 4.13±1.24. No differences were observed between groups in any outcome analyzed. CONCLUSION:Both groups showed significant changes in the analyzed outcomes. However, the workplace-based exercise program was not superior to the exercise booklet.
Keywords: Shoulder pain, occupational health, agricultural workers’ diseases, workplace, controlled clinical trial, exercise therapy, resistance training
DOI: 10.3233/WOR-230085
Journal: Work, vol. 77, no. 4, pp. 1143-1151, 2024
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl