Do psychological job demands, decision control and social support predictreturn to work three months after  a return-to-work (RTW) programme? The rapid-RTW cohort study

Issue title: Workplace-based Efforts in Promoting Health and Preventing Disability in Norway

Guest editors: Randi W. Aas, Ruth K. Raanaas and Lynn Shaw

Article type: Research Article

Authors: Haveraaen, Lise A.^{a; *} | Skarpaas, Lisebet S.^{a; c} | Berg, John E.^c | Aas, Randi W.^{a; b; c}

Affiliations: [a] Presenter, Stavanger, Norway | [b] Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway | [c] Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Sciences, Oslo, Norway

Correspondence: [*] Address for correspondence: Lise A. Haveraaen, Presenter, Stavanger Innovation Park, Prof. Olav Hanssens vei 7A NO-4021 Stavanger, Norway. Tel.: +47 51 87 47 49; E-mail: lise.haveraaen@presenter.no.

Abstract: BACKGROUND:Long-term sickness absence is a considerable health and economic problem in the industrialised world. Factors that might predict return to work (RTW) are therefore of interest. OBJECTIVE:To examine the impact of psychosocial work characteristics on RTW three months after the end of a RTW programme. METHODS:A cohort study of 251 sick-listed employees from 40 different treatment and rehabilitation services in Norway recruited from February to December 2012. The Job Content Questionnaire was used to gather information on the psychosocial work conditions. Full or partial RTW was measured three months after the end of the RTW programme, using data from the national sickness absence register. Logistic regression analyses were performed to investigate the association between the psychosocial work characteristics and RTW. RESULTS:Having low psychological job demands (OR = 0.4, 95% CI: 0.2–0.9), high co-worker- (OR = 3.4, 95% CI: 1.5–5.8), and supervisor support (OR = 3.4, 95% CI: 1.6–7.3), and being in a low-strain job (low job demands and high control) (OR = 4.6, 95% CI: 1.1–18.6) were predictive of being in work three months after the end of the RTW programme, after adjusting for several potential prognostic factors. CONCLUSION:Interventions aimed at returning people to work might benefit from putting more emphasise on psychosocial work characteristics in the future.

Keywords: The rapid-RTW-study, sick leave, sickness absence, demand-control-support model, psychosocial work environment, job strain

DOI: 10.3233/WOR-152216

Journal: Work, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 61-71, 2016