Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Bordignon, Maiaraa; * | Marziale, Maria Helena Paluccib; 1 | Sutherland, Melissa A.c; 2 | Monteiro, Inêsd; 3
Affiliations: [a] Toledo Campus, Federal University of Paraná, Toledo, PR, Brazil | [b] WHO Collaborating Centre for Nursing Research Development (PAHO), College of Nursing, University of São Paulo at Ribeirão Preto, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil | [c] College of Nursing, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI, USA | [d] Work and Health Research Group, Faculty of Nursing, University of Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil
Correspondence: [*] Address for correspondence: Maiara Bordignon, Toledo Campus, Federal University of Paraná, Toledo, Brazil. E-mail: bordignonmaiara@gmail.com; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7766-4612.
Note: [1] ORCID: 0000-0003-2790-3333.
Note: [2] ORCID: 0000-0002-0242-2536.
Note: [3] ORCID: 0000-0002-6004-8378.
Abstract: BACKGROUND:Nursing professionals are on the front line of health systems in Brazil as well as worldwide. Studies on the work ability of nursing professionals are especially relevant as care demands increase and health care workforce shortages are expected. As the population of Brazil ages, the need for nursing care will increase. OBJECTIVE:To identify levels and predictors of work ability among Brazilian nursing professionals. METHODS:A cross-sectional study with 267 nursing professionals (72 nurses and 195 nursing technicians and nursing auxiliary) from public emergency and urgent care units was conducted. Measures included the following: Work Ability Index; Questionnaire of Socio-demographics, Lifestyle and Work and Health Aspects; and Violence at Work questionnaire. Generalized linear regression and Poisson models were used for data analysis. RESULTS:The mean work ability was 40.4 (range: 22 to 49). Almost 79.6% (n = 211) of participants reported good or excellent work ability, and 20.4% (n = 54) reported moderate or poor work ability. Better perceptions of health and job satisfaction, absence of health issues (past 15 days), lower stress levels, and having a partner were associated with better work ability. Victims of workplace violence were less likely to have good or excellent work ability than non-victims (prevalence ratio = 0.80; 95% CI 0.72 to 0.90). Professionals with cumulative experiences of workplace violence were less likely to report better work ability. CONCLUSIONS:The prevalence of good or excellent work ability was 79.6%. Our findings indicate that the following factors are predictors of work ability: self-reported perception of health, health issues in the last 15 days, workplace violence, job satisfaction, stress, and marital status.
Keywords: Work capacity evaluation, nursing staff, occupational health, emergency nursing, health workforce
DOI: 10.3233/WOR-211300
Journal: Work, vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 673-683, 2023
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl