Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Vooijs, Marloesa; * | Hazelzet, Astrid M.a | van Kesteren, Nicole M.C.b | Verhoef, Helena | Otten, Wilmab
Affiliations: [a] Sustainable Productivity and Employability, Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research TNO, Leiden, The Netherlands | [b] Child Health, Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research TNO, Leiden, The Netherlands
Correspondence: [*] Address for correspondence: Marloes Vooijs, Sustainable Productivity and Employability, Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research TNO, Leiden, The Netherlands. E-mail: marloes.vooijs@tno.nl.
Abstract: BACKGROUND:Being able to participate in work is an important determinant of health. Therefore, reintegration professionals provide support to clients to return to work (RTW). Since RTW has a significant impact on a client’s life, it is preferred that clients are involved in the decision-making process of RTW. A method to do so, is shared decision-making (SDM), involving the following steps: collaborating as a team, explaining to clients that they can be part of the decision-making process, setting a shared goal, presenting and discussing choice options, and making a shared decision. OBJECTIVE:We explored how clients experience and prefer these SDM steps in their current and ideal interaction with professionals. METHODS:We performed semi-structured interviews with fourteen clients receiving support in their RTW process from four different municipalities. RESULTS:Clients emphasised the importance of collaborating as team. None of the clients reported having been told that they could be part of the decision-making process, or discussed a shared goal with a professional, which they would prefer. Some clients were presented choice options. When choice options were discussed, frequently only the negative aspects of choice options were explained by the professional. A great number of clients experienced that shared decisions were made, but based this on the shared effort made by the client and professional to RTW. CONCLUSIONS:Clients generally wish to cooperate and participate in the decision-making process, but their ability to do so is limited due to not being fully involved in the SDM steps.
Keywords: Self-management, client participation, autonomy, evidence-based, employment
DOI: 10.3233/WOR-211023
Journal: Work, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 227-235, 2023
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl