Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Ohlendorf, Danielaa; 1 | Schneidereit, Lauraa; 1 | Hermanns, Ingob | Holzgreve, Fabiana; * | Maltry, Lauraa | Ellegast, Rolfb | Wanke, Eileen M.a | Nienhaus, Albertc | Groneberg, David A.a
Affiliations: [a] Institute of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany | [b] Institute for Occupational Health and Safety (IFA), German Social Accident Insurance (DGUV), Sankt Augustin, Germany | [c] Competence Center for Epidemiology and Health Services Research for Healthcare Professionals (CVcare), Institute for Health Services Research in Dermatology and Nursing (IVDP), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
Correspondence: [*] Address for correspondence: Fabian Holzgreve, Institute of Occupational Medicine, Social Medicine and Environmental Medicine, Goethe University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, Building 9a, 60596 Frankfurt am Main, Germany. E-mail: holzgreve@med.uni-frankfurt.de.
Note: [1] These authors contributed equally to this work.
Abstract: BACKGROUND:Working in forced postures and standing continuously can be classified as straining the musculoskeletal system. OBJECTIVE:Since such postures are frequently used in hospital canteen kitchens, we used kinematic analysis to determine the working postures of canteen kitchen staff. METHODS:In this study, the daily work routine of 18 (11 w/7 m) workers of a hospital canteen kitchen (Frankfurt Main/Germany) aged 21–62 years (46±13 years) was examined by means of kinematic analysis (CULEA system; IFA; Sankt Augustin/Germany) and a detailed computerized analysis of the activities performed on-site. Angle values of the head and trunk were evaluated in accordance with ergonomic standards and presented using percentile values (P05-P95). The OWAS method was also employed to capture the proportions of standing, walking and sitting work. RESULTS:The kinematic posture analysis showed for all activities on the conveyor belt a tendency towards a dorsally inclined body position: trunk inclination (–7.5° to 0), thoracic spine inclination or a bending forward (–11.3° to 0°) and curvature of the back within the thoracic spine (–15.2° to 0°). In addition, >90% of the “activities on the belt” (46% of the daily working routine) were carried out standing. CONCLUSION:The activities on the conveyor belt were characterized by a tendency towards hyperextension of the trunk, possibly due to a too high working environment. Furthermore, an increased burden on body structures while standing can be concluded. From a primary prevention perspective, this increased standing load should be reduced by behavioral and relational prevention measures.
Keywords: Musculoskeletal diseases, canteen kitchen, kinematic analysis, CUELA, occupational medicine
DOI: 10.3233/WOR-205170
Journal: Work, vol. 73, no. 3, pp. 881-894, 2022
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl