Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Donelly, Michellea | Gordon, Scotta; b; * | Bowling, Alisona
Affiliations: [a] School of Health and Human Sciences, Southern Cross University, East Lismore, NSW, Australia | [b] Next Generation Mobility, Currumbin, QLD, Australia
Correspondence: [*] Address for correspondence: Scott Gordon, Next Generation Mobility, 16 Pall Mall Avenue, Currumbin, QLD4223, Australia. E-mail: sgordon@nextgenmobility.com.au.
Abstract: BACKGROUND:Among Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD] countries, Australians with disabilities are most at risk of experiencing poverty. Employment equity is essential for wellbeing, health and social inclusion. Reported differences in income level between people with and without disabilities vary widely between 0 to 47% depending on productivity assumptions. Contradictory to these assumptions, empirical research has demonstrated that people with disabilities often have equivalent skills, superior loyalty and lower absentee rates. OBJECTIVE:To investigate if there is a significant difference in the annual remuneration, hours worked and age-related career trajectory of graduates with and without disabilities. METHODS:Descriptive statistics and regression analysis were used to identify employment equity between graduates with and without disabilities in the 2011 Australian Census. RESULTS:Graduates with disabilities received a mean weekly income that was 53% of the income of graduates without disabilities and 85% of the mean hourly income. Female graduates with disabilities received the lowest mean income of all subgroups at 35% of the mean weekly income of male graduates without disabilities CONCLUSION:This corroborates previous research that reports people with disabilities have difficulty obtaining employment, experience insecure employment and have fewer career and promotional opportunities. The income gaps were significantly greater than gaps previously reported.
Keywords: Social inclusion, wage disparity, gender, indigeneity
DOI: 10.3233/WOR-203109
Journal: Work, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 547-561, 2020
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl