Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Issue title: Occupational Ergonomics and Safety, Part 1
Subtitle:
Guest editors: Pedro Arezes
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Joines, Sharona | James, Tamarab; * | Liu, Siwena | Wang, Wenjiaoa | Dunn, Rebeccab | Cohen, Shanec
Affiliations: [a] Industrial Design, College of Design, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA | [b] Ergonomics Division, Occupational & Environmental Safety, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA | [c] Bosco Perry Design, LLC, Potomac, MD, USA
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: Tamara James, Ergonomics Director, Duke University & Health System, Box 3834 DUMC, Durham, NC 27710, USA. Tel.: +1 919 681 3140; Fax: +1 919 286 6763; E-mail:tamara.james@duke.edu
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Lighting is a part of every work task in the office environment, yet it is often overlooked. Research links direct and indirect glare to increased risk of visual discomfort among office workers with symptoms ranging from dry eyes to blurry vision or headaches. Researchers have been primarily concerned with those characteristics of task lighting that cause glare including luminance level, position (line of sight), and control. It is unknown what the benefits of adjustable task lights are and whether or not their use has an effect on musculoskeletal comfort or posture. No comprehensive field evaluations of this type were found among peer-reviewed, indexed journals. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the ergonomic and calculated utility power consumption benefits of adjustable LED task lighting in an office environment using a control/intervention experiment design. METHODS: One hundred participants were originally recruited and randomly assigned to intervention and control groups. Self-reported data was collected on level of eye fatigue, perception of job content, intervention usability, and musculoskeletal discomfort. Data was also collected on workspace level of illumination and posture during standardized tasks (assessed using RULA). RESULTS: Comparing baseline data to follow-up data for the intervention group, the use of the adjustable, LED task lights provided statistically significant, positive impacts on users' rating of discomfort, eye fatigue, perception of job content, and posture between baseline and the short-term follow up. CONCLUSIONS: Significant benefits to musculoskeletal comfort, posture, and visual comfort were documented when participants used the adjustable task lights. Participants' assessments of the light's usability, usefulness and desirability were positive. There were no negative results found with adjustable task light use.
Keywords: Musculoskeletal, vision, usability, posture, discomfort
DOI: 10.3233/WOR-141879
Journal: Work, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 471-481, 2015
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl