Remote online ergonomic assessment in the office environment as compared to face-toface ergonomic assessment

Abstract

Goal - remote online ergonomic assessment in the office environment as compared to face-to-face ergonomic assessment and examination of the applicability of remote online ergonomic assessment to office workers. 40 employees from a large Israeli hi-tech company were ergonomically assessed per the University of California computer usage checklist, according to the two assessment types (face-to-face and remote). An additional Ergonomist “assessor 2” examined the credibility of the process. Results: Research hypothesis 1 was verified: 21 out of 22 questions (95.45%) from the checklist indicated compatibility between “assessor 1” to the “Gold Standard” at an 80% level. Research hypothesis 2: examining the credibility between the assessors with regard to remote assessment. This hypothesis was partially verified, the correlation between the assessors was measured at 0.54. Research hypothesis 3: examining the extent of deviation of natural posture between distal body parts assessment (distant from the center of the body) and proximal body parts (close to the center of the body). This hypothesis was clearly verified. It has been proven that there is statistical significance between the results. Conclusions: The current research has proved that there is an additional method to assess musculoskeletal disorders risk factors remotely online at office environment.