Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Issue title: Injuries and Prevention in Healthcare Providers
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Wästberg, Birgitta A. | Haglund, Lena | Eklund, Mona
Affiliations: Department of Health Sciences, Division of Occupational Therapy and Gerontology, Lund University, Sweden | Department of Social and Welfare Studies, Faculty of Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
Note: [] Address for correspondence: Birgitta A. Wästberg, Department of Health Sciences, Division of Occupational Therapy and Gerontology, Lund University, Faculty of Medicine, P.O. Box 157, SE 221 00 Lund, Sweden. Tel.: +46 462221951; Fax: +46 462221959; E-mail: birgitta.wastberg@med.lu.se
Abstract: Objective: To develop a self-report alternative to the Work Environment Impact Scale (WEIS). Participants: First the novel instrument was used and evaluated by ten occupational therapists and 45~clients in primary health care. Then the instrument was used by 26~clients who participated in a rehabilitation programme in another primary health care district. Methods: The instrument was investigated in two steps. First content validity and utility were investigated through a questionnaire addressed to occupational therapists and their clients respectively. The response distribution was calculated by frequencies. Internal consistency was investigated. In the second step, a revised version of the instrument was investigated for test-retest reliability and internal consistency. The test-retest reliability was calculated by weighted kappa. The internal consistency of the WEIS-SR was calculated by means of Cronbach's alpha. Results: In step one the content validity was good to moderately good, the utility was good, and the internal consistency was satisfactory (0.72). In step two the internal consistency was good (0.88/0.89) and the test-retest reliability was mostly good to moderate (0.35–0.78, median 0.61). Conclusions: The instrument will be further investigated in other populations and take into consideration additional psychometric properties such as sensitivity to change, predictive validity, and concurrent validity.
Keywords: Return to work, work environment, assessment, psychometric properties, MOHO
DOI: 10.3233/WOR-2012-1418
Journal: Work, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 447-457, 2012
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl