Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Issue title: 20th Anniversary Issue
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Shaw, Lynn | Campbell, Heather | Jacobs, Karen | Prodinger, Birgit
Affiliations: School of Occupational Therapy, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada | School of Health Studies, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada | Sargent College of Health & Rehabilitation Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA | Graduate Program in Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Western Ontario, Elborn College, London, Ontario, Canada
Note: [] Address for correspondence: Lynn Shaw, School of Occupational Therapy, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada, N6G 1H1. E-mail: leshaw@uwo.ca
Abstract: Introduction: The aim of this review was to gain an understanding of the first 20 years of contributions to WORK within the assessment domain and to reflect on the perspectives underscoring this knowledge base. Method: A narrative review of assessment articles using the WORK ARTicle database was conducted. Assessment articles were searched using issues from 1990 to 2009. Descriptive data was analyzed to examine historical trends of the specific types and dimensions of articles, the regional location of the contributions, and the methodological accordance. A reflective process was used by an editorial board member of WORK to inductively interpret perspectives and contextual issues that underpinned the evolution of the assessment domain in WORK. Results: Over half of $N=$ 108 of the articles on assessment in WORK focused on establishing or reporting reliability and validity of assessments used in clinical practice or evaluation research. The majority of the assessment articles were predominantly focused on the person. Contributions of articles were from 5 regions: North America, Europe, Australia, Asia and Africa. Conclusions: Assessment articles in WORK have contributed to the development of evidence to support assessment of the worker. These articles represent a knowledge base that emphasizes evidence-based assessments to evaluate what a person can and cannot do to participate in work. Efforts are needed to expand knowledge generation in assessment to include more evaluations on the workplace and occupation dimensions, and that also considers the worker in context.
Keywords: Knowledge base, evaluation, descriptive, evidence base, international
DOI: 10.3233/WOR-2010-0989
Journal: Work, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 257-267, 2010
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl