Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Issue title: Biomechanics and Evaluating the Workplace
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Grenier, S.G. | Eger, T.R. | Dickey, J.P.
Affiliations: School of Human Kinetics, Laurentian University, Sudbury, ON, Canda. Kinesiology Department, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
Note: [] Address for correspondence: Dr. Sylvain Grenier, School of Human Kinetics, Laurentian University, 935 Ramsey Lake Road, Sudbury, Ontario, P3E 2C6, Canada. Tel.: +1 705 675 1151 ext 1095; Fax: +1 705 675 4845; E-mail: sgrenier@laurentian.ca
Abstract: Background: Laboratory studies have typically been used to establish a relationship between whole body vibration (WBV) magnitude, frequency, exposure duration and reported discomfort. However, the relationship between subjective reports of discomfort, and predicted comfort response according to International Standards Organization (ISO) 2631-1, predicted health risks according to ISO 2631-1 and reported musculoskeletal discomfort has not been examined. The purpose here was to compare discomfort values predicted by ISO 2631-1 with the subjective discomfort reported by nine Load-haul-dump (LHD) operators during typical operating conditions. Methods: Vibration exposure at the operator/seat interface was measured and processed, for one-hour duration, according to criteria established in ISO 2631-1. Vibration total values were determined for 1-minute exposure periods and the LHD operators provided a discomfort score associated with the same vibration exposure period. A linear regression analysis and correlation was carried out to determine the strength of the relationship between the predicted subjective reports of discomfort, ISO 2631-1 discomfort, objectively measured acceleration levels and reported musculoskeletal discomfort. Findings: Reported discomfort was poorly correlated to ISO discomfort scores (r=0.1799). Vibration exposure values and Musculo-Skeletal Disorder (MSD) variables were related to both ISO 2631-1 discomfort and to reported discomfort. The MSD scores produced stronger relationships with reported discomfort scores than did the vibration exposure values.
Keywords: Whole-body vibration, discomfort, ISO 2631-1, equipment operators, vibration
DOI: 10.3233/WOR-2010-0957
Journal: Work, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 49-62, 2010
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl