Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Issue title: Ergonomics
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Cole, Donald C.; ; | Theberge, Nancy; ; ; | Dixon, Shane M. | Rivilis, Irina; | Neumann, W. Patrick; ; | Wells, Richard; ;
Affiliations: Department of Kinesiology, Faculty of Applied Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada | Department of Sociology, Faculty of Arts, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada | Institute for Work and Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada | Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Ryerson University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada | Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada | Centre of Research Expertise for the Prevention of Musculoskeletal Disorders, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada | Department of Community Health Sciences, Brock University
Note: [] Address for correspondence: Donald C. Cole, Institute for Work & Health, 481 University Avenue, Ste 800, Toronto, Ontario, Canadá, M5G 2E9. Tel.: 416 927 2027 ext 2166; Fax: 416 927 4167; E-mail: dcole@iwh.on.ca
Abstract: Evaluations of participative ergonomics (PE) interventions have reported mixed results, potentially due to both program and theory deficits. In a multiple case study of four worksites in different companies using a quasi-experimental approach, we examined process, implementation, and effects. The process evaluation was based upon fieldwork and interviews with approximately 90 persons. Implemented changes were documented by PE teams and intensity judged by the research team. The effect evaluation was performed using questionnaire-based measures (physical effort, influence, pain and potential confounders) among cohorts present both before and after the changes (N=258). Ergonomic change teams (ECTs) faced challenges securing employees' time, varying management commitment and significant production pressures. Nevertheless they actively introduced between 10 and 21 changes over 10–20 months of activity. Limited intensity of exposure reduction was observed, resulting in no discernible effects on physical effort or pain among the employees. Potential reasons that may account for limited effects and lessons for workplace parties, practitioners, and intervention researchers are discussed.
Keywords: Program evaluation, longitudinal study, musculoskeletal disorders, prevention and control
DOI: 10.3233/WOR-2009-0914
Journal: Work, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 161-178, 2009
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl