Fish harvesters with injuries' accounts of their experiences with the workers' compensation system

Article type: Research Article

Authors: Murray, Michael

Affiliations: School of Psychology, Keele University, Staffs ST5 5BG, UK. E-mail: m.murray@keele.ac.uk

Abstract: The workers' compensation system was established to provide fair access to compensation for workers who have experienced occupational injury and can no longer work. It was expected that such a system would reduce individual legal claims. Evidence indicates that many injured workers proceed with a variety of appeals indicating dissatisfaction with the current system. The fishing industry is extremely dangerous. The aim of this research was to explore the experience of injured fish harvesters who were making use of a compensation system. Interviews were held with a sample of injured in-shore and deep-sea fish harvesters. In general, they identified themselves strongly as hard-working people who did not deserve their injury. They also reported substantial frustration with the staff of the compensation system who they believed treated them with suspicion and disrespect. The deep-sea fish harvesters were more concerned with the amount of compensation. This dissatisfaction with the system contributed to the fish harvesters' use of the appeals procedure. The fish harvesters' complaints are discussed with reference to the concepts of distributive and procedural justice.

Keywords: Injured workers, distributive and procedural justice

Journal: Work, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 47-56, 2007