Reproducibility of a task description questionnaire for working pregnant women

Article type: Research Article

Authors: Cheng, P.L. | Dumas, G.A. | Smith, J.T. | Leger, A. | Plamondon, A. | McGrath, M.J. | Tranmer, J.E.

Affiliations: Department of Mechanical Engineering, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada | Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada | School of Rehabilitation Therapy, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada | IRSST, Montreal, Quebec, Canada | Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada | School of Nursing and Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada

Note: [] Address for correspondence: Genevieve A Dumas, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada, K7L 3N6. Tel.: +1 613 533 2648; Fax: +1 613 533 6489; E-mail: dumas@me.queensu.ca

Abstract: The objective of this study was to evaluate the reproducibility of a Task Description Questionnaire that was designed to investigate exposures to, and influential factors for, problematic tasks experienced by working pregnant women. The questionnaire comprised questions concerning 22 task components (covering working posture, manual material handling, work pace, prolonged postures and others), eight influential factors contributing to problematic tasks, discomfort (measured using a body map) and level of effort to perform the tasks. Reproducibility of the questionnaire was assessed by interviewing participants on two occasions one week apart for interviews at both 20 and 34 weeks of pregnancy. Eleven and 13 problematic tasks were reported by 21 working pregnant women at 20 and 34 weeks of pregnancy, respectively. These tasks were surveyed using the Task Description Questionnaire. Kappa statistics and correlation coefficients (supplemented by paired t-tests) were used to examine the reproducibility of responses to the questionnaire. The results showed that most of the variables were measured with very good or satisfactory reproducibility. The reproducibility of exposure to work posture was higher than that of exposure to manual material handling. There was no significant difference between test and retest means for the discomfort scores measured on the body map, except for the maximum discomfort score for the whole body in the 34 weeks survey. The study suggests that the questionnaire can be reliably used in the study of problematic tasks experienced by pregnant women. But an initial preview of the questions by the subjects and explanation of the questions given to the subjects by the interviewer may help to produce more reliable results.

Keywords: Reproducibility, reliability, task analysis, pregnant women, risk factors

Journal: Work, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 389-397, 2006