Biomechanical evaluation of different plunger size and plunger position on removing soft contact lenses and rigid gas permeable contact lenses

Article type: Research Article

Authors: Hsiao, Min-Chien^{a; b} | Yen, Yu-Chun^c | Wang, Chun-Hsiang^c | Chen, Yen-Nien^d | Wang, Shun-Ping^{e; f} | Su, Kuo-Chih^{c; g; *}

Affiliations: [a] Department of Medical Education, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan | [b] Department of Medical Education, Changhua-Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan | [c] Department of Medical Research, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan | [d] Department of Physical Therapy, Asia University, Taichung, Taiwan | [e] Department of Orthopaedics, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan | [f] Department of Post-Baccalaureate Medicine, College of Medicine, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan | [g] Department of Medical Equipment Development and Application, Hung Kuang University, Taichung, Taiwan

Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: Kuo-Chih Su, Department of Medical Research, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung 407, Taiwan. E-mail: kcsu@vghtc.gov.tw.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: To avoid risks of mucosal infection from contact lenses removal, a contact lens plunger is often used. OBJECTIVE: Given various types of contact lens plungers available on the market, no study has yet been done on mechanical effects of the contact lens plunger on contact lens removal. Here, this study used finite element analysis to investigate the effects of plunger size and plunger position on the removal of soft and rigid gas permeable (RGP) contact lenses. METHODS: First, we established finite element analysis models for the plunger, contact lens, cornea, and aqueous humor. The plunger is made of mostly silicone rubber, and the contact lenses are mainly made of soft and hard material. The part of the plunger used for removal was located either at the central or the edged position, with pulling 1 mm distance. The main parameters observation indicators of in this study were the reaction force at the fixed end of the cornea, aqueous humor, the von Mises stress of the plunger, the contact lenses, and the cornea. RESULTS: Results of this study showed that when a plunger of a larger diameter was used, the reaction force of the plunger was also larger, especially when applied to RGP lenses, which required a slightly larger force (∼0.27 N). Also, when removing a RGP lens from the edge, there was a greater stress at the edge of the contact lens (2.5799 MPa), and this caused a higher stress on both the cornea (0.0165 MPa) and the aqueous humor (0.00114 MPa). CONCLUSIONS: When using a plunger with a larger diameter to remove a RGP lens, although a larger force required, the relatively larger contact area likely reduced the stress on the cornea and aqueous humor, thereby reducing the risk of eye injury. In addition, when removing a RGP lens, the results of this study recommended it to be removed from the plunger edge, as that facilitated the removal of contact lens.

Keywords: Plunger design, contact lenses, finite element analysis, biomechanics

DOI: 10.3233/THC-231983

Journal: Technology and Health Care, vol. Pre-press, no. Pre-press, pp. 1-13, 2024