Affiliations: [a] Department of Obstetrical, Shenzhen People’s Hospital, Shenzhen, China | [b] Department of Obstetrical, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, China | [c] Department of Obstetrical, Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China
Correspondence:
[*]
Corresponding author: Xiaohui Guo, Department of Obstetrical, Shenzhen People’s Hospital, No. 1017 of Dongmen North Road, Luohu District, Shenzhen 518020, China. Tel.: +86 18676796981; E-mail: xiaohuiguo263@163.com.
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Electronic foetal monitoring (EFM), a method to monitor foetal intrauterine conditions and foetal reserve capacity, is the most extensively used intrauterine monitoring technology in obstetrics. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to compare the Thoth wearable foetal electrocardiogram (foetal ECG [FECG]) monitoring system with a traditional Doppler foetal heart monitoring system before labour to investigate their respective values in clinical application. METHODS: A total of 393 pregnant women admitted to our hospital between 2020 and 2022 participated in this study. They were recruited using the convenience sampling method. We employed a paired design to assess the confusion rate, trend overlap, and foetal heart rate/ECG monitoring consistency, whereas a completely randomised design was used to measure pregnancy outcome indicators. The participants were divided into two groups using a random number table: the Thoth group (n= 196) and the traditional Doppler group (n= 197). Each group was monitored using the corresponding system. RESULTS: The Thoth monitor demonstrated a lower confusion rate compared with the traditional Doppler monitor (0.25% vs 2.04%; χ2= 5.508, P= 0.019). The trend overlap in foetal heart rates was consistently 100%, with 91.2% of readings showing a consistency rate of ⩾ 95%. Additionally, the Thoth monitor recorded a higher cumulative interruption time in the foetal heart rate curve (12.13 ± 2.22 vs 21.02 ± 2.34; t= 18.471, P< 0.001) and more abnormal ECGs (21.21 ± 4.32 vs 18.21 ± 2.91; t= 7.582, P< 0.001) than the traditional Doppler system. CONCLUSION: The Thoth wearable FECG monitor offers several advantages over the traditional Doppler foetal heart monitoring system. These include a reduced confusion rate, more accurate data collection, a lower rate of clinical misjudgement, reduced workload for medical staff, and enhanced comfort during vaginal delivery. The rates of emergency caesarean sections and neonatal asphyxia in the Thoth group were marginally lower than those in the Doppler group, which may be attributed to issues such as ECG disconnection or interference from the maternal heart rate.
