Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Zhu, Yu-Linga; 1 | Wang, Shengb; 1 | Gu, Yana | Mao, Maoa | Yan, Li-Huaa; *
Affiliations: [a] Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Nantong First Peoples’ Hospital, Nantong University Second Affiliated Hospital, Nantong, Jiangsu, China | [b] Nantong Prefectural Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nantong, Jiangsu, China
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: Li-Hua Yan, Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Nantong First Peoples’ Hospital, Nantong University Second Affiliated Hospital, No. 68 Hai’er Xiang North Road, Nantong, Jiangsu 226001, China. Tel.: +86 15950889766; E-mail: lhyan4789@outlook.com.
Note: [1] These authors contributed equally to this study.
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Aortic dissection is usually managed with interventional therapy, conservative therapy, and surgery to inhibit disease progression and improve prognoses. Nevertheless, the absence of meticulous and effective nursing during the treatment greatly increases the complication rates, which is detrimental to the recovery of patients. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore the efficacy of predictive pain intervention in the nursing process of patients with aortic dissection. METHODS: Sixty patients with aortic dissection who were admitted to our hospital from December 2018 to December 2020 were observed in this study. Specifically, these patients were randomly and equally classified into Group A (patients who were given conventional nursing intervention) and Group B (patients who were given predictive pain intervention). Subsequently, the pain score, complication rates, and nursing satisfaction in the two groups were compared and analyzed. RESULTS: Compared with patients in Group A, patients in Group B had significantly lower pain scores (P< 0.05); complication rates were significantly lower in Group B than in Group A (6.67% vs. 23.33%, P< 0.05); patient satisfaction with care was significantly better in Group B compared to Group A (96.67% vs. 73.33%, P< 0.05). CONCLUSION: Predictive pain intervention is widely recognized as useful in the treatment of patients with aortic dissection. It has significant clinical application value as it can largely alleviate pain and is relatively safe for patients.
Keywords: Aortic dissection, efficacy, predictive pain intervention
DOI: 10.3233/THC-231066
Journal: Technology and Health Care, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 2925-2930, 2024
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl