Clinical value of cognitive behavioral nursing model to patients with congenital glaucoma

Article type: Research Article

Authors: Hu, Huijun | Ma, Yanfang^* | Cheng, Aiai | Zhang, Zengqiang

Affiliations: Department of Anesthesiology Surgery, Taiyuan Central Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China

Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: Yanfang Ma, Department of Anesthesiology Surgery, Taiyuan Central Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, No. 1 Dongsandao Lane, Taiyuan, Shanxi 030009, China. E-mail: mmayanfang@163.com.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: There have been studies on the use of cognitive behavioral nursing intervention (CBNI) but the main subjects were patients with secondary glaucoma and there are fewer studies on the care of congenital glaucoma. OBJECTIVE: To explore the clinical value of cognitive behavioral nursing model in patients with congenital glaucoma. METHODS: One hundred and fifty-three postoperative patients with congenital glaucoma treated in our hospital between January 2021 and December 2022 were prospectively selected for the study and randomly divided into a control group (n= 77) and an observation group (n= 76). The control group was given routine nursing, and the observation group was given cognitive behavioral nursing mode on the basis of the control group. Anxiety self-assessment scale (SAS), depression self-assessment scale (SDS), Connor-Davidson toughness scale, and treatment adherence evaluation scale were used to evaluate the psychological state, mental toughness, treatment adherence, treatment effect and nursing care satisfaction in the two groups before and after 2 weeks of intervention. The efficacy of the treatment was also assessed by determining the visual acuity (VA), intraocular pressure (IOP), and mean defective (MD) value of the visual field of the two groups of patients. RESULTS: After nursing, the SDS score (46.33 ± 6.16 versus 53.21 ± 5.94) and SAS score (44.41 ± 5.6 versus 52.82 ± 6.31) in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (P< 0.05). The scores of optimism (11.55 ± 1.90 versus 8.20 ± 1.95), self-improvement (22.05 ± 3.60 versus 17.60 ± 4.30), tenacity (37.45 ± 3.10 versus 28.90 ± 4.55) and total score (71.35 ± 8.00 versus 56.85 ± 8.50) in the observation group were higher than those in the control group (P< 0.05). After care, the VA of the observation group (0.95 ± 0.22) was greater than that of the control group (0.84 ± 0.16), and the IOP (14.25 ± 0.58 versus 15.89 ± 0.67) and the MD (5.42 ± 0.46 versus 6.68 ± 0.49) of the observation group were less than that of the control group. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P< 0.05). The compliance (96.05% versus 85.71%) and nursing satisfaction (96.10% versus 85.71%) of the observation group were higher than those of the control group (P< 0.05). CONCLUSION: Cognitive-behavioural nursing care for glaucoma patients can improve patients’ mental toughness, improve visual acuity, reduce intraocular pressure and mean visual field defect values, and have a positive effect on enhancing patients’ treatment adherence and nursing satisfaction.

Keywords: Cognitive behavioral nursing, congenital glaucoma, compliance, self-management

DOI: 10.3233/THC-230772

Journal: Technology and Health Care, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 1757-1766, 2024