Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Kosmopoulos, Victora; b; * | Luedke, Coltenc | Nana, Arvind D.a; c
Affiliations: [a] Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, USA | [b] Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of North Texas, Denton, TX, USA | [c] Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, John Peter Smith Hospital, Fort Worth, TX, USA
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: Victor Kosmopoulos, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of North Texas Health Science Center, 3400 Camp Bowie Blvd, Fort Worth, TX 76107, USA. Tel.: +1 817 735 0488; E-mail: victor.kosmopoulos@yahoo.com.
Abstract: Background:A smaller humerus in some patients makes the use of a large fragment fixation plate difficult. Dual small fragment plate constructs have been suggested as an alternative. Objective:This study compares the biomechanical performance of three single and one dual plate construct for mid-diaphyseal humeral fracture fixation. Methods:Five humeral shaft finite element models (1 intact and 4 fixation) were loaded in torsion, compression, posterior-anterior (PA) bending, and lateral-medial (LM) bending. A comminuted fracture was simulated by a 1-cm gap. Fracture fixation was modelled by: (A) 4.5-mm 9-hole large fragment plate (wide), (B) 4.5-mm 9-hole large fragment plate (narrow), (C) 3.5-mm 9-hole small fragment plate, and (D) one 3.5-mm 9-hole small fragment plate and one 3.5-mm 7-hole small fragment plate. Results:Model A showed the best outcomes in torsion and PA bending, whereas Model D outperformed the others in compression and LM bending. Stress concentrations were located near and around the unused screw holes for each of the single plate models and at the neck of the screws just below the plates for all the models studied. Other than in PA bending, Model D showed the best overall screw-to-screw load sharing characteristics. Conclusion:The results support using a dual small fragment locking plate construct as an alternative in cases where crutch weight-bearing (compression) tolerance may be important and where anatomy limits the size of the humerus bone segment available for large fragment plate fixation.
Keywords: Finite element analysis, internal fracture fixation, mechanical stress, bone plates, humerus
DOI: 10.3233/THC-140875
Journal: Technology and Health Care, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 83-92, 2015
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl