Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Fisher, Katharinea | Easton, Katherineb; *
Affiliations: [a] School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK | [b] Centre for Assistive Technology and Connected Healthcare, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: Katherine Easton, CATCH (Centre for Assistive Technology and Connected Healthcare), The Innovation Centre, 217 Portobello, Sheffield S1 4DP, UK. Tel.: +44 114 22 20690; E-mail: k.a.easton@sheffield.ac.uk.
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Sight loss adversely affects older adults’ (> 65 years) ability to complete daily activities. Digital technology can support functional performance but literature focusing on its use by older people with sight loss is limited. OBJECTIVE: To explore the meaning of digital technology, including factors influencing its adoption, from the perspectives of older adults with sight loss. METHOD: In-depth data was generated via a focus group (n= 4) and analysed using thematic analysis. In addition, a questionnaire survey (n= 30) increased breadth of knowledge regarding digital device adoption. RESULTS: Following thematic analysis, digital technology was equated with complexity. Portable, easy-to-use technology and devices enabling meaningful outcomes were favoured. Barriers to adoption included: high cost, lack of accessible information, unreliability and constantly changing products. Conversely, resource exchange and an interest in technology facilitated acceptance. Physical properties, user interface, accessibility and practical experience concurrently hindered and supported device use. Survey results indicate that most non-digital adopters were > 80 years old, and commonly cited reasons were ‘lack of interest’ and ‘too difficult to use’. CONCLUSION: Older adults with sight loss may be at particular risk of deeming digital technology to be inaccessible. Family and/or peer influence and experimenting with a device could challenge negative preconceptions.
Keywords: Low vision, age-related sight loss, older adults, digital technology, mixed methods
DOI: 10.3233/TAD-180205
Journal: Technology and Disability, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 177-184, 2019
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl