Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Landrock, Utaa; * | Menold, Nataljab
Affiliations: [a] Department of Sociology, University of Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, Germany | [b] GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, Mannheim, Germany
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: Uta Landrock, Department of Sociology, University of Kaiserslautern, Erwin-Schroedinger-Strasse 57, 67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany. Tel.: +49 631 205 4604; Fax: +49 631 205 4610; E-mail:landrock@sowi.uni-kl.de
Abstract: Falsification of survey data in face-to-face surveys has been intensively discussed in the literature. The results about the impact of falsifications on survey data are equivocal. While some authors report a strong impact, others find only little differences between real and falsified data. We argue that the impact of falsifications cannot be neglected, particularly when theory-driven analyses are conducted and not ad hoc analyses. The latter reproduce stereotypes used by both, researchers and falsifiers. To test this assumption we compare the results of multivariate regression analyses with real and falsified data by using a) theory-driven predictors and b) ad hoc predictors. As an example of theory-driven analyses we used the theory of planned behavior (TPB) for predicting self-reported healthy eating behavior. As ad hoc predictors we included socio-demographic information about the respondents known to the falsifiers as well as variables, which are indicated by everyday theories. The results show that theory-driven relationships were more strongly pronounced in the real data. In contrast, stereotypical and non-theory-driven relationships were more strongly pronounced in the falsified data. The results provide insights in the area of social cognition when predicting the behavior of others.
Keywords: Interviewer falsifications, falsified survey data, data quality
DOI: 10.3233/SJI-161020
Journal: Statistical Journal of the IAOS, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 305-312, 2016
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl