Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Giraud, Anne-Lisea; * | Lee, Hyo-Jeonga; b
Affiliations: [a] Inserm U742, UPMC-Paris 6 & Département d’études cognitives, Ecole Normale Supérieure, Paris, France | [b] Department of Otolaryngology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: A.-L. Giraud, Département d’études cognitives, Ecole Normale Supérieure, 29 rue d’Ulm, 75005 Paris, France. Tel.: +33 (0)1 4432 2954; Fax: +33 (0)1 4432 3610; E-mail: anne-lise.giraud@ens.fr.
Abstract: Purpose: Cochlear implantation is an effective technique for restoring hearing in the profoundly deaf. Although cochlear implants are a therapeutical success, huge performance variability in speech comprehension is observed after implantation. The reason for this remains incompletely understood after 20 years of clinical practice and basic research. Which patients are going to respond well and why is an unresolved question. The duration of auditory deprivation plays an important role, and currently is the main predictor of implantation success in children; basically, the earlier the better. However, among patients with identical duration of deafness, performance remains highly variable, suggesting there are other more fundamental factors that determine clinical outcome. Methods: To delineate the cognitive factors that could influence the clinical outcome of cochlear implantation, we correlated resting metabolism PET images acquired before implantation in congenitally deaf children with speech perception behavioural scores measured three years after implantation. Results: Using this paradigm, we showed distinct brain organisation patterns in the deaf brain, which predict good and bad speech perception outcome after cochlear implantation. Conclusions: These data show that brain organisation assessed immediately before cochlear implantation can efficiently predict subsequent speech outcome.
Journal: Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, vol. 25, no. 3-4, pp. 381-390, 2007
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl