Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Jiang, Naifua; b; c | Wei, Jinsongd | Li, Guangshengc; d | Wei, Bod | Zhu, Frank F.c | Hu, Yongc; *
Affiliations: [a] CAS Key Laboratory of Human-Machine Intelligence-Synergy Systems, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China | [b] The Shenzhen Engineering Laboratory of Neural Rehabilitation Technology, Shenzhen, China | [c] Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong | [d] Department of Orthopaedics, Spinal Division, Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, China
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: Dr. Yong Hu, Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The University of Hong Kong, 12 Sandy Bay Road, Pokfulam, Hong Kong. Tel.: +(852) 29740359; Fax: +(852) 29740335; E-mail: yhud@hku.hk.
Abstract: Background:Dry-electrode-based transcranial direct current stimulation is a new type of non-invasive brain stimulation system which relieves chronic low back pain and improves related muscle movement, in a way that overcomes the drawback of conventional systems. Objective:To investigate the effectiveness of dry-electrode-based transcranial direct current stimulation in relieving chronic low back pain and altering pain-related low back muscles movement, by using pain assessment tool and surface electromyographic topography. Methods:We conducted a prospective, double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled study. 60 patients with non-specific chronic low back pain were randomly and evenly allocated into tDCS and sham groups. Each group accepted a single 20-minute stimulation at 2 mA on the primary motor cortex. Numeric rating scale for pain intensity assessment and root-mean-square difference parameter from surface electromyographic topography were measured before and after stimulation. The current direction in brain using finite element method was simulated to verify the current distribution under dry stimulation electrode. Results:After stimulation, the pain intensity in the tDCS group significantly decreased, while it did not show evident change in the sham group. However, change of root-mean-square difference parameters between tDCS and sham groups showed no significant difference. Simulation results based on finite element method showed most of current focused on primary motor cortex while peak value of current density was 0.225 A/m2. Conclusions:Dry-electrode-based transcranial direct current stimulation can lower pain perception in patients with chronic low back pain. The analgesic mechanism can affect the top-down modulation pathway of pain.
Keywords: Pain measurement, finite element analysis, analgesia, electrodes
DOI: 10.3233/RNN-190922
Journal: Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 41-54, 2020
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl