Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Dumont, Laurencea | El Mouderrib, Sofiab | Théoret, Hugoa; c; *
Affiliations: [a] Université de Montréal, Department of Psychology, Montréal, Canada | [b] Université du Québec à Montréal, Department of Psychology, Montréal, Canada | [c] Research Center, CHU Ste-Justine, Montréal, Canada
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: Hugo Théoret, PhD, Department of psychology, University of Montreal, CP 6128, Succ. Centre-Ville, Montreal, Qc, H3C3J7, Canada. Tel.: 514-343-6362; E-mail: hugo.theoret@umontreal.ca.
Abstract: Background:Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique commonly used to modulate cognitive functions; so-called “anodal” stimulation is considered to increase cortical excitability while “cathodal” stimulation is presumed to have the opposite result. Yet, a growing number of recent studies question the robustness of this polarity-dependent effect, namely because of the important inter-individual variability with regards to tDCS modulatory effects. A plausible reason for this heterogenous response may lay in task impurity issues in the evaluation of cognitive functions. Objective:To address the question of task impurity the NIH-Examiner, a neuropsychological test battery that uses latent variables, which assess the common variance across multiple measures of a given concept, was administered to 24 healthy individuals following tDCS. This battery contains 11 tasks and provides latent variables for general executive functioning, fluency, cognitive control and working memory. Methods:Anodal, cathodal, and sham stimulation (20 minutes, 1.5 mA) was administered over left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and right supra-orbital area in a randomized, crossover, sham-controlled, double blind protocol. Results:Factorial scores and task performance indices of executive function were not modulated by tDCS. Conclusions:Offline tDCS has limited impact on executive functions at both the task and factorial levels. This suggests that reducing task impurity does not increase the effectiveness of tDCS in modulating cognitive functions.
Keywords: Executive functions, transcranial direct current stimulation, NIH-Examiner, latent variables, frontal cortex
DOI: 10.3233/RNN-180872
Journal: Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 755-766, 2018
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl