Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Nardone, Raffaelea; b; c; * | Langthaler, Patrick B.a; c; d | Orioli, Andreab | Höller, Petera; c | Höller, Yvonnea | Frey, Vanessa N.a; c | Brigo, Francescob; e | Trinka, Eugena; c
Affiliations: [a] Department of Neurology, Christian Doppler Klinik, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria | [b] Department of Neurology, Franz Tappeiner Hospital, Merano, Italy | [c] Spinal Cord Injury and Tissue Regeneration Center, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria | [d] Department of Mathematics, Paris Lodron University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria | [e] Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine, and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: Dr. Raffaele Nardone, Department of Neurology – “F. Tappeiner” Hospital – Meran/o,Via Rossini, 5, 39012 Meran/o (BZ) – Italy. Tel.: +39 0473/264616; Fax: +39 0473/264449; E-mail: raffaele.nardone@asbmeran-o.it.
Abstract: Purpose: Spasticity is a common disorder in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI). The aim of this study was to investigate whether intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS), a safe, non-invasive and well-tolerated protocol of excitatory repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), is effective in modulating spasticity in SCI patients. Methods: In this randomized, double-blind, crossover, sham-controlled study, ten subjects with incomplete cervical or thoracic SCI received 10 days of daily sessions of real or sham iTBS. The H/M amplitude ratio of the Soleus H reflex, the amplitude of the motor evoked potentials (MEPs) at rest and during background contraction, as well as Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) and the Spinal Cord Injury Assessment Tool for Spasticity (SCAT) were compared before and after the stimulation protocols. Results: Patients receiving real iTBS showed significant increased resting and active MEPs amplitude and a significant reduction of the H/M amplitude ratio. In these patients also the MAS and SCAT scores were significantly reduced after treatment. These changes persisted up to 1 week after the end of the iTBS treatment, and were not observed under the sham-TBS condition. Conclusion: These findings suggest that iTBS may be a promising therapeutic tool for the spasticity in SCI patients.
Keywords: Intermittent theta burst stimulation, spinal cord injury, spasticity, motor evoked potential, H/M amplitude ratio, Modified Ashworth Scale, Spinal Cord Injury Assessment Tool for Spasticity
DOI: 10.3233/RNN-160701
Journal: Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 287-294, 2017
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl