Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Issue title: Special Section: Language System Plasticity in Aphasia
Guest editors: Roy Hamilton
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Thiel, Alexander* | Zumbansen, Anna*
Affiliations: Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montreal, Canada and Jewish General Hospital with Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Montreal, QC, Canada
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: Alexander Thiel, MD, Professor Neurology and Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosciences, Jewish General Hospital, 3755 Chemin de la Côte Sainte-Catherine, Montreal, QC, H3T1E2, Canada. Tel.: +1 514 340 8222 Ext. 5844; Fax: +1 514 340 7567; E-mail: alexander.thiel@mcgill.ca.
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: Anna Zumbansen, PhD, Jewish General Hospital, 3755 Chemin de la Côte Sainte-Catherine, Montreal, QC, H3T1E2, Canada. Tel.: +1 514 340 8222 Ext. 4311; Fax: +1 514 340 7567; E-mail: anna.zumbansen@mail.mcgill.ca.
Abstract: Background: Post-stroke aphasia syndromes as a clinical entity arise from the disruption of brain networks specialized in language production and comprehension due to permanent focal ischemia. This approach to post-stroke aphasia is based on two pathophysiological concepts: 1) Understanding language processing in terms of distributed networks rather than language centers and 2) understanding the molecular pathophysiology of ischemic brain injury as a dynamic process beyond the direct destruction of network centers and their connections. While considerable progress has been made in the past 10 years to develop such models on a systems as well as a molecular level, the influence of these approaches on understanding and treating clinical aphasia syndromes has been limited. Objective & Methods: In this article, we review current pathophysiological concepts of ischemic brain injury, their relationship to altered information processing in language networks after ischemic stroke and how these mechanisms may be influenced therapeutically to improve treatment of post-stroke aphasia. Conclusion: Understanding the pathophysiological mechanism of post-stroke aphasia on a neurophysiological systems level as well as on the molecular level becomes more and more important for aphasia treatment, as the field moves from standardized therapies towards more targeted individualized treatment strategies comprising behavioural therapies as well as non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS).
Keywords: Aphasia, ischemic stroke, language network, pathophysiology of stroke, speech and language therapy, transcranial magnetic stimulation, transcranial direct current stimulation
DOI: 10.3233/RNN-150632
Journal: Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 507-518, 2016
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl