Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Duret, Christophe | Hutin, Emilie | Lehenaff, Laurent | Gracies, Jean-Michel
Affiliations: CRF Les Trois Soleils, Médecine Physique et de Réadaptation, Unité de Rééducation Neurologique, Boissise-Le-Roi (77), France | Analyse et Restauration du Mouvement, Groupe Hospitalier Henri Mondor, Rééducation Neurolocomotrice, AP-HP, Créteil (94), France
Note: [] Corresponding author: Dr. Christophe Duret, CRF Les Trois Soleils, 19 rue du Château, 77310 Boissise-Le-Roi, France. Tel.: +33 164718; Fax: +33 160657625; E-mail: Ch.duret@les-trois-soleils.fr
Abstract: Purpose: Upper limb robot-assisted rehabilitation is a highly intensive therapy, mainly recommended after stroke. Whether robotic therapy is suitable for subacute patients with severe impairments including cognitive disorders is unknown. This retrospective study explored factors impacting on motor performance achieved in a 16-session robotic training combined with standard rehabilitation. Methods: Seventeen subacute inpatients (age 53 ± 18; 49 ± 26 days post-stroke) were assessed at baseline using upper extremity motor impairments scales, Functional Independence Measure, aphasia and neglect scores. Number of movements and robotic assistance were compared between Session 2 (S2), 8 (8) and 16 (S16), Motricity Index between pre and post-treatment. Correlation analyses explored predictors of motor performance. Results: Overall, number of movements and Motricity Index increased significantly while robot-assistance decreased. The mean number of movements per session correlated positively with baseline motor capacities but not with age, aphasia and neglect. However, the increase in Motricity index correlated negatively with baseline Motricity index and the increase in the number of movements correlated negatively with the number of movements at S2. Conclusion: High intensity robot-assisted training may be associated with motor improvement in subacute hemiparesis. More severely impaired patients may derive greater benefit from robot-assisted training; age, aphasia and neglect do not represent exclusion criteria.
Keywords: Hemiparesis, upper limb, subacute stroke, robot-assisted training
DOI: 10.3233/RNN-140418
Journal: Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 57-65, 2015
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl