Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Meesen, Raf L.J.; ; | Thijs, Herbert | Leenus, Daphnie J.F.; | Cuypers, Koen; ;
Affiliations: BIOMED, Biomedical Research Institute, Hasselt University, Agoralaan, Diepenbeek, Belgium | REVAL Research Institute, Hasselt University, Agoralaan, Diepenbeek, Belgium | Motor Control Laboratory, Research Center for Movement Control and Neuroplasticity, Research Center for Movement Control and Neuroplasticity, Group Biomedical Sciences, K.U. Leuven, Tervuursevest, Heverlee, Belgium | I-BioStat, Interuniversity Institute for Biostatistics and Statistical Bioinformatics, Hasselt University, Agoralaan, Diepenbeek, Belgium and Leuven University, Leuven, Belgium
Note: [] Corresponding author: Koen Cuypers, REVAL Research Institute, Hasselt University, Agoralaan, Building A, B-3590, Diepenbeek, Belgium. Tel.: +32 11 29 21 24; Fax: +32 11 26 93 29; E-mail: koen.cuypers@uhasselt.be
Abstract: Purpose: To assess the effects of atDCS on motor performance in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). Previously, anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (atDCS) has been shown to improve motor performance in healthy subjects and neurodegenerative populations. However, the effect of atDCS on motor performance is not examined in MS. Methods: In the current study, a sham controlled double-blind crossover design was used to evaluate the effect of 20 minutes of 1 mA atDCS or sham tDCS (stDCS) on a unimanual motor sequence-training task, consisting of sequential finger presses on a computer keyboard with the most impaired hand. Patients received stimulation (atDCS or stDCS) during motor training. tDCS was applied over the primary motor cortex contralateral to the most impaired hand. Motor performance was assessed immediately before, during and 30 minutes after stimulation. Results: Although we need to be careful with the interpretation of the data due to lack of power, our results showed no significant effect of atDCS on motor performance. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that atDCS-supported motor training was not able to improve motor performance more than sham-supported motor training. Possibly, the effects of atDCS are mediated by specific MS-related characteristics. Furthermore, increasing atDCS intensity and offering multiple stimulation sessions might be necessary to optimize motor performance resulting from atDCS-supported motor training.
Keywords: Multiple sclerosis, transcranial direct current stimulation, tDCS, neural rehabilitation, motor training
DOI: 10.3233/RNN-130348
Journal: Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 293-300, 2014
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl