Affiliations: [a]
Department of Medicine, Afe Babalola University, Ado-Ekiti, Nigeria
| [b]
Department of Neurology, Institute of Human Behaviour and Allied Sciences, New Delhi, India
| [c]
Neurology Department, University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria
| [d]
Center for Genomics and Precision Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria
| [e]
Lebanese American University, Beirut, Lebanon
| [f]
Department of Medicine, University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria
| [g]
Blossom Specialist Medical Center, Ibadan, Nigeria
Correspondence:
[*]
Address for correspondence: Prof. Mayowa O. Owolabi, DrM, MD, DSc, FAAN, FANA, FRCP, FAMedS, FAAS, FAS. Tel.: +234 802 077 5595; E-mail: mayowaowolabi@yahoo.com.
Abstract: BACKGROUND:Telerehabilitation as a new subdiscipline of telehealth is the application of information technology to support and deliver rehabilitation services via two-way or multipoint interactive online telecommunication technology. This enables the therapist to optimize the timing, intensity, and duration of therapy which is often not possible within the constraints of face-to-face treatment protocols in current health systems. OBJECTIVE:To review the historical perspective and conceptual framework of telerehabilitation in neurological disorders. METHODS:A narrative review of the literature was performed for the historical perspective and a systematic review of the conceptual framework was performed using the PRISMA guidelines on chronic neurological disorders; multiple sclerosis, spinal cord injury, stroke, Parkinson’s disease, cognitive impairment, and headaches. The search included articles from the past 20 years (2004 to 2024). RESULTS:Telerehabilitation dates back to the 1960s and early 1970s. Documented effective interventions were mostly on therapies for speech disorders. The conceptual framework consisted of three major components of telerehabilitation programmes including development, implementation, and evaluation. The COVID-19 pandemic suddenly made telerehabilitation come to the limelight because physical distancing became necessary. Out of the 110,000 articles downloaded, 43 met the inclusion criteria for review on the conceptual framework of telerehabilitation in relation to neurological disorders. The articles discussed multiple sclerosis (2), spinal cord disorders (1), stroke (17), Parkinson’s disease (15), headaches (3), and cognitive disorders (5). All articles reviewed assessed the effectiveness of telemedicine except for the articles on multiple sclerosis and spinal cord disorders which examined the interphase between the technology and the end users. CONCLUSION:The future of telerehabilitation looks promising with the subsequent integration of innovative tools and applications. This will require the adaption of technology, continuous capacity building, education, and training of healthcare professionals to ensure that they are adequately equipped with the necessary skills to provide quality virtual reality rehabilitation care.
