Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Mostofinejad, Amina | Goodman, Rachela | Loria, Tristanb | Thaut, Michaelb | Tremblay, Luca; c; *
Affiliations: [a] Faculty of Kinesiology and Physical Education, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada | [b] Faculty of Music, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada | [c] KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
Correspondence: [*] Address for correspondence: Luc Tremblay, Perceptual-Motor Behaviour Laboratory, Centre for Motor Control, Faculty of Kinesiology and Physical Education, 55 Harbord St., University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, M5 S 2W6, Canada. E-mail: luc.tremblay@utoronto.ca.
Abstract: BACKGROUND:There is equivocal evidence regarding the effectiveness of robotic guidance on the (re)learning of voluntary motor skills. Robotic guidance can improve the performance of continuous/ tracking skills, although being seldom more effective than unassisted practice alone. However, most of the previous studies employed robotic guidance on all intervention trials. Recently, we showed that mixing robotic guidance with unassisted practice (i.e., mixed practice) can significantly improve the learning of a golf putting task. Yet, these mixed practice studies involved self-paced movements in a standing posture, thus less applicable to rehabilitation contexts. OBJECTIVE:The current study aimed to investigate the influence of mixed practice on the timing accuracy of an upper-limb, rhythmic, sequential task. The goal was to assess the feasibility of integrating mixed practice with music-based interventions. METHODS:Two groups of participants performed circle-drawing sequences in synchrony with rhythmic auditory signals. They completed a pre-test and an acquisition phase, followed by immediate retention and transfer tests. One group received robotic guidance on 50% of the acquisition trials (i.e., mixed practice), whereas another group always practiced unassisted. The pre-test, retention, and transfer tests were performed unassisted. RESULTS:Both groups significantly improved their timing accuracy and precision between the pre-test and the retention test. CONCLUSION:This study provides further evidence that mixed practice can facilitate the (re)learning of voluntary actions, especially with the type of externally paced upper-limb movements employed in music-based interventions.
Keywords: Robotic guidance, motor learning, timing, upper-limb, rehabilitation
DOI: 10.3233/NRE-220286
Journal: NeuroRehabilitation, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 61-70, 2023
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl