Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Villán-Villán, Mailin Adrianaa; b; * | Pérez-Rodríguez, Rodrigoa; b | Martín, Cristinac | Sánchez-González, Patriciaa; b | Soriano, Ignasic | Opisso, Eloyc | Hernando, M. Elenaa; b | Tormos, José Maríac | Medina, Josepc | Gómez, Enrique J.a; b
Affiliations: [a] Biomedical Engineering and Telemedicine Centre (GBT), ETSI Telecomunicación, Center for Biomedical Technology (CTB), Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM), Madrid, Spain | [b] Biomedical Research Networking Center in Bioengineering, Biomaterials and Nanomedicine (CIBER-BBN), Zaragoza, Spain | [c] Institut Guttmann Neurorehabilitation Hospital, Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona, Badalona, Spain
Correspondence: [*] Address for correspondence: Mailin Adriana Villán-Villán, Biomedical Engineering and Telemedicine Centre (GBT), ETSI Telecomunicación, Center for Biomedical Technology (CTB), Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM), Avenida Complutense 30, Madrid, Spain. Tel.: +34 915495700; E-mail: mvillan@gbt.tfo.upm.es..
Abstract: BACKGROUND:The increasing number of patients with acquired brain injury and the current subjectivity of the conventional upper extremity (UE) assessment tests require new objective assessment techniques. OBJECTIVE:This research proposes a novel objective motor assessment (OMA) methodology based on the Fugl-Meyer assessment (FMA). The goals are to automatically calculate the objective scores (OSs) of FMA-UE movements (as well as a global OS) and to interpret the estimated OSs. METHODS:Fifteen patients participated in the study. The OMA algorithm was designed to detect small-scale variations in UE movements. The OSs for 14 FMA-UE movements and the global OSs were automatically calculated using the algorithm and evaluated by 2 therapists. The interpretation of the global OSs was performed at 3 levels: by item, movement and globally. RESULTS:The global OSs calculated by our algorithm had a significant correlation with the therapists’ scores (0.783 and 0.938, p < 0.01). All OSs for each movement were correlated with the scores given by the therapists. The correlation coefficient can reach values as high as 0.981 (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS:We provide a new objective assessment tool for therapists to help them improve the diagnostic accuracy and to achieve a more personalized and potentially effective physical rehabilitation of brain injury patients.
Keywords: Physical and rehabilitation medicine, Fugl-Meyer assessment upper extremity, brain injury, stroke, objective assessment tool, algorithm, kinematic analysis
DOI: 10.3233/NRE-172315
Journal: NeuroRehabilitation, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 429-439, 2018
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl