Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Issue title: The Practice of Cognitive Rehabilitation Therapy
Guest editors: Rick Parente
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Nordvik, Jan E.a; * | Walle, Kjersti Mæhluma; b | Nyberg, Claudia K.a; c | Fjell, Anders M.c | Walhovd, Kristine B.c | Westlye, Lars T.b; d | Tornas, Sveinunga
Affiliations: [a] Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital HT, Nesodden, Norway | [b] Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway | [c] Research Group for Lifespan Changes in Brain and Cognition, Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway | [d] Norwegian Center for Mental Disorders Research (NORMENT), K.G.Jebsen Center for Psychosis Research, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
Correspondence: [*] Address for correspondence: Jan E. Nordvik, The Cognitive Rehabilitation Unit, Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital, Bjørnemyrveien 11, 1450 Nesoddtangen, Norway. Tel.: +47 977 12 091; Fax: +47 66 91 25 76; E-mail: j.e.nordvik@gmail.com
Abstract: Background:Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has brought about advances in the fields of brain plasticity and lifespan brain change, that might be of special interest for cognitive rehabilitation research and, eventually, in clinical practice. Parallel, intensive cognitive training studies show promising results for the prospect of retraining some of the impaired functioning following acquired brain injury. Objectives:However, cognitive training research is largely performed without concurrent assessments of brain structural change and reorganization, which could have addressed possible mechanisms of training-related neuroplasticity. Methods:Criticism of cognitive training studies is often focused on lack of ecologically valid, daily-living assessments of treatment effect, and on whether the applied cognitive measures overlap too much with the training exercises. Yet, the present paper takes another point of view, where the relevance of recent MRI research of brain plasticity to the field of cognitive rehabilitation is examined. Results:Arguably, treatment ought to be measured at the same level of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health model, as it is targeting. In the case of cognitive training that will be the “body structure” and “body function” levels. Conclusions:MRI has shown promise to detect macro- and microstructural activity-related changes in the brain following intensive training.
Keywords: Cognitive training, cognitive rehabilitation, brain plasticity, magnetic resonance imaging, diffusion tensor imaging, brain morphometry
DOI: 10.3233/NRE-131017
Journal: NeuroRehabilitation, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 81-85, 2014
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl