Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Youse, Kathleen M.a; * | Coelho, Carl A.b
Affiliations: [a] University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA | [b] University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: Kathleen M. Youse, University of Kentucky, College of Health Sciences, Division of Communication Disorders, 900 South Limestone Street, 120J, Lexington, KY 40536, USA. Tel.: +1 859 323 1100 ext. 80475; E-mail: kathleen.youse@uky.edu
Abstract: Background:It is documented that individuals with closed head injury (CHI) demonstrate difficulty with narrative and conversational discourse. Effective conversational discourse requires a complex interaction of linguistic, cognitive, and social abilities [6]. Reduced attention and concentration are among the most common cognitive sequela following CHI [39]. Aims:The present study investigated whether treatment of attention would facilitate conversational discourse for individuals with CHI. Two treatment protocols were investigated, the first social skills-based, and the second attention-based. It was hypothesized that attention training would improve not only attentional skills but also conversation, however social skills training, would only facilitate conversational skills. Methods and Procedures:A single subject multiple treatments comparison design was employed with two individuals who were post-onset of CHI. Treatment effects on conversational performance were calculated using the f statistic [18] for measures of response appropriateness during conversations. Outcomes and Results:Effect sizes suggested that both treatments were active; however, the participants’ performances were variable reducing the magnitude of change observed. Results indicated minimal change from baselines, only partially supporting the research hypotheses. Conclusions:Although the two treatment regimens had some effect on the participants’ conversational performances it was not to the extent anticipated. The issues of candidacy for such treatments as well as the importance of incorporating natural contingencies into interventions for conversation training are discussed.
DOI: 10.3233/NRE-2009-0490
Journal: NeuroRehabilitation, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 355-364, 2009
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl