Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Kong, Yana | Xu, Muchenb | Wei, Xiandinga | Qian, Danqia | Yin, Yuanc | Huang, Zhaohuic | Gu, Wenchaod | Zhou, Leyuana; b; *
Affiliations: [a] Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University, Wuxi, Jiangsu, China | [b] Department of Radiation Oncology, Dushu Lake Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University, Medical Center of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China | [c] Wuxi Cancer Institute, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University, Wuxi, Jiangsu, China | [d] Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: Leyuan Zhou, Department of Radiation Oncology, Dushu Lake Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, 215000, China. Tel./Fax: +86 0512 65955524; E-mail: zhouleyuan99@126.com.
Abstract: OBJECTIVE:To investigate the use of non-contrast-enhanced (NCE) and contrast-enhanced (CE) CT radiomics signatures (Rad-scores) as prognostic factors to help improve the prediction of the overall survival (OS) of postoperative colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. METHODS:A retrospective analysis was performed on 65 CRC patients who underwent surgical resection in our hospital as the training set, and 19 patient images retrieved from The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA) as the external validation set. In training, radiomics features were extracted from the preoperative NCE/CE-CT, then selected through 5-fold cross validation LASSO Cox method and used to construct Rad-scores. Models derived from Rad-scores and clinical factors were constructed and compared. Kaplan-Meier analyses were also used to compare the survival probability between the high- and low-risk Rad-score groups. Finally, a nomogram was developed to predict the OS. RESULTS:In training, a clinical model achieved a C-index of 0.796 (95% CI: 0.722–0.870), while clinical and two Rad-scores combined model performed the best, achieving a C-index of 0.821 (95% CI: 0.743–0.899). Furthermore, the models with the CE-CT Rad-score yielded slightly better performance than that of NCE-CT in training. For the combined model with CE-CT Rad-scores, a C-index of 0.818 (95% CI: 0.742–0.894) and 0.774 (95% CI: 0.556–0.992) were achieved in both the training and validation sets. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated a significant difference in survival probability between the high- and low-risk groups. Finally, the areas under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves for the model were 0.904, 0.777, and 0.843 for 1, 3, and 5-year survival, respectively. CONCLUSION:NCE-CT or CE-CT radiomics and clinical combined models can predict the OS for CRC patients, and both Rad-scores are recommended to be included when available.
Keywords: Colorectal cancer, overall survival, radiomics, nomogram
DOI: 10.3233/XST-230090
Journal: Journal of X-Ray Science and Technology, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 1281-1294, 2023
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl