Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Hu, Zhanlia | Chen, Zixianga | Zhou, Chaob | Hong, Xudaa | Chen, Jianweia | Zhang, Qiyanga; c | Jiang, Changhuia; c | Ge, Yongshuaia | Yang, Yongfenga | Liu, Xina | Zheng, Haironga | Li, Zhichenga; * | Liang, Donga; *
Affiliations: [a] Lauterbur Research Center for Biomedical Imaging, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China | [b] Department of Nuclear Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China | [c] Shenzhen College of Advanced Technology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding authors. Dong Liang and Zhicheng Li, Lauterbur Research Center for Biomedical Imaging, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen 518055, China. E-mails: dong.liang@siat.ac.cn (Dong Liang) and zc.li@siat.ac.cn (Zhicheng Li).
Abstract: Breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer in women worldwide. Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), which is based on limited-angle tomography, was developed to solve tissue overlapping problems associated with traditional breast mammography. However, due to the problems associated with tube movement during the process of data acquisition, stationary DBT (s-DBT) was developed to allow the X-ray source array to stay stationary during the DBT scanning process. In this work, we evaluate four widely used and investigated DBT image reconstruction algorithms, including the commercial Feldkamp-Davis-Kress algorithm (FBP), the simultaneous iterative reconstruction technique (SIRT), the simultaneous algebraic reconstruction technique (SART) and the total variation regularized SART (SART-TV) for an s-DBT imaging system that we set up in our own laboratory for studies using a semi-elliptical digital phantom and a rubber breast phantom to determine the most superior algorithm for s-DBT image reconstruction among the four algorithms. Several quantitative indexes for image quality assessment, including the peak signal-noise ratio (PSNR), the root mean square error (RMSE) and the structural similarity (SSIM), are used to determine the best algorithm for the imaging system that we set up. Image resolutions are measured via the calculation of the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and artefact spread function (ASF). The experimental results show that the SART-TV algorithm gives reconstructed images with the highest PSNR and SSIM values and the lowest RMSE values in terms of image accuracy and similarity, along with the highest CNR values calculated for the selected features and the best ASF curves in terms of image resolution in the horizontal and vertical directions. Thus, the SART-TV algorithm is proven to be the best algorithm for use in s-DBT image reconstruction for the specific imaging task in our study.
Keywords: Stationary digital breast tomosynthesis (s-DBT), carbon nanotube (CNT), image reconstruction, image accuracy, image resolution
DOI: 10.3233/XST-200668
Journal: Journal of X-Ray Science and Technology, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 1157-1169, 2020
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl