Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Zhang, Hong-Xiaa; 1 | Sun, Zong-Qiongb; 1 | Cheng, You-Gena; * | Mao, Guo-Quna
Affiliations: [a] Department of Radiology, Tongde Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China | [b] Department of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University, The Fourth People’s Hospital of Wuxi City, Wuxi, Jiangsu, China
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: You-Gen Cheng, Department of Radiology, Tongde Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310012, China. Tel.: +86 15312238218; E-mail: qiong953780@163.com.
Note: [1] These authors contributed equally to this work.
Abstract: PURPOSE:To explore the radiomics features of triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) and non-triple negative breast cancer (non-TNBC) based on X-ray mammography, and to differentiate the two groups of cases. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Preoperative mammograms of 120 patients with breast ductal carcinoma confirmed by surgical pathology were retrospectively analyzed, which include 30 TNBC and 90 non-TNBC patients. The manual segmentation of breast lesions was performed by ITK-SNAP software and 12 radiomics features were extracted by Omni-Kinetics software. The differences of these radiomics features between TNBC and non-TNBC groups were compared, and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine the optimal cutoff value of each radiomics parameter for differentiating TNBC from non-TNBC, and the corresponding area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity and specificity were obtained. RESULTS:There were statistically significant differences for 4 radiomics features between TNBC and non-TNBC datasets (P < 0.05). They were the roundness, concavity, gray average and skewness of breast lesions. Compared with non-TNBC, TNBC cases have following characteristics of (1) more round with the roundness of 0.621 vs. 0.413 (P < 0.001), (2) more regular with the concavity of 0.087 vs. 0.141 (P < 0.01), (3) higher density or gray average (67.261 vs. 56.842, P < 0.05), and (4) lower skewness (– 0.837 vs.– 0.671, P = 0.034). AUCs of ROC curves computed using features of the roundness and concavity were both larger than 0.70. CONCLUSION:Radiomics features based on X-ray mammography may be helpful to distinguish between TNBC and non-TNBC, which were associated with breast tumor histology.
Keywords: Triple negative breast cancer, X-ray mammography, quantitative imaging markers, evaluation of tumor characteristics
DOI: 10.3233/XST-180488
Journal: Journal of X-Ray Science and Technology, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 485-492, 2019
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl