Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Issue title: New Developments in ADA Implementation
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Hurley, Jessica E. | Monasterio, Eugenio A. | McMahon, Brian T. | West, Steven L.
Affiliations: Department of Rehabilitation Counseling, Virginia Commonwealth University, VA, USA | Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Virginia Commonwealth University, VA, USA | School of Allied Health Professions, Virginia Commonwealth University, VA, USA | Center for Rehabilitation Science and Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University, VA, USA
Note: [] Address for correspondence: Jessica E. Hurley, Department of Rehabilitation Counseling, Virginia Commonwealth University, P.O. Box 980330, Richmond, VA 23298-0330, USA. Tel.: +1 804 270 7547; Fax: +1 804 827 1321; E-mail: hurleyje@vcu.edu
Abstract: ADA Title I allegations are investigated and closed by the EEOC either with or without merit. Allegations resolved with merit indicate that actual disability employment discrimination took place against the person filing the allegation (the charging party) and those resolved without merit indicate that no discrimination took place. This study examined the drivers or predictors of merit in allegations filed by charging parties with mental illness (e.g., anxiety, depression, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, and unknown mental illness). Results indicated that the primary driver for ADA Title I allegations is [discrimination] Issue and corroborated the lower merit rate for mental illness allegations (19.83%) as compared to non mental illness allegations (23.39%). Further analysis of the Merit and Non Merit Resolution Types by non parametric tests of proportion between allegations filed by charging parties with mental illness and those filed by charging parties without mental illness also corroborated the lower mental illness allegation merit rate. The lower merit rate for mental illness allegations may indicate that: 1) there is less actual employment discrimination occurring against persons with mental illness; 2) that allegations filed by persons with mental illness are inherently difficult to prove; and/or 3) that the merit rate for mental illness allegations might be higher if they were not potentially under-reported. Implications, conclusions, and directions for future research are provided.
Keywords: ADA Title I, ADA and mental illness, disability
DOI: 10.3233/JVR-2012-0592
Journal: Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 171-185, 2012
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl