Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Issue title: Successful Innovations for Improving VR Outcomes: Findings from the Substantial Gainful Activity Demonstration
Guest editors: Susan Foley and Purvi Sevak
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Taylor, Allison B.; * | Blackburn, Nerlie
Affiliations: Institute for Community Inclusion, University of Massachusetts, Boston, MA, USA
Correspondence: [*] Address for correspondence: Allison B. Taylor, Institute for Community Inclusion, University of Massachusetts, Boston, 100 Morrissey Blvd, Boston, MA 02125, USA. Tel.: +1 617 287 4300; Fax: +1 617 287 4352; E-mail: allison.taylor@umb.edu.
Abstract: BACKGROUND:The SGA Model Demonstration included a qualitative follow-along study of participants’ return-to-work decision-making. OBJECTIVE:The authors describe the findings, including motivations of SSDI beneficiaries to seek employment and vocational rehabilitation (VR) services, and the social, familial and personal considerations in returning to work. METHODS:This study used a longitudinal qualitative approach, involving a series of in-depth interviews with SSDI beneficiaries who sought services from state VR agencies in Minnesota and Kentucky. RESULTS:Motivations of SSDI beneficiaries to seek employment extend beyond economic need. Fear and confusion associated with balancing financial risks and rewards of returning to work influenced whether participants felt ready to do so. Yet while financial considerations are important, they are often embedded in or superseded by motivations related to family engagement, roles, and responsibilities; activity and social engagement; and the personal meanings of work. Financial and benefits counseling provided through the SGA Model was widely praised by participants, and the informed decision-making process facilitated by the coordinated team approach allowed many to envision pathways that had not previously seemed viable. CONCLUSIONS:Decisions to return to work are governed by multifaceted processes. VR services that are responsive to these complexities can empower individuals to make informed decisions.
Keywords: People with disabilities, employment of people with disabilities, social security beneficiaries, qualitative research, vocational rehabilitation
DOI: 10.3233/JVR-201108
Journal: Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 319-333, 2020
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl