Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Abrahamsen, Emil Riisa; b; * | Skals, Regitze Kuhrc | Hougaard, Dan Duponta; b
Affiliations: [a] Department of Otolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery and Audiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark | [b] Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark | [c] Unit of Clinical Biostatistics, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: Emil Riis Abrahamsen, Hobrovej 18-22, 9000 Aalborg, Denmark. Tel.: +45 51905968; Fax: +45 97662721; E-mail: e.abrahamsen@rn.dk.
Abstract: BACKGROUND:It has not yet been tested whether averaged gain values and the presence of pathological saccades are significantly altered by manual data selection or if data selection only done by the incorporated software detection algorithms provides a reliable data set following v-HIT testing. OBJECTIVE:The primary endpoint was to evaluate whether the averaged gain values of all six SCCs are significantly altered by manual data selection with two different v-HIT systems. METHOD:120 subjects with previously neither vestibular nor neurological disorders underwent four separate tests of all six SCCs with either EyeSeeCam® or ICS Impulse®. All v-HIT test reports underwent manual data selection by an experienced ENT Specialist with deletion of any noise and/or artifacts. Generalized estimating equations were used to compare averaged gain values based on unsorted data with averaged gain values based on the sorted data. RESULTS:EyeSeeCam®: Horizontal SCCs: The estimate and the p-value (shown in parenthesis) for the right lateral SCC and the left lateral SCC were 0.00004 (0.95) and 0.00087 (0.70) respectively. Vertical SCCs: The estimate varied from –0.00858 to 0.00634 with p-values ranging from 0.31 to 0.78. ICS Impulse®: Horizontal SCCs: The estimate and the p-value for the right lateral SCC and the left lateral SCC were 0.00159 (0.18) and 0.00071 (0.38) respectively. Vertical SCCs: The estimate varied from 0.00217 to 0.01357 with p-values ranging from 0.00 to 0.17. Based upon the averaged gain value from the individual SCC being tested, 148 tests before and 127 after manual data selection were considered pathological. CONCLUSION:None of the two v-HIT systems revealed any clinically important effects of manual data selection. However, 21 fewer tests were considered pathological after manual data selection.
Keywords: Video head impulse test, vestibular function, vestibular testing, vestibulo-ocular reflex, gain, head-mounted devices, data selection
DOI: 10.3233/VES-200717
Journal: Journal of Vestibular Research, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 305-317, 2020
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl