Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Govender, Sendhila | Colebatch, James G.a; b; *
Affiliations: [a] Department of Neurology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, Sydney, NSW, Australia | [b] Prince of Wales Clinical School and Neuroscience Research Australia, University of New South Wales, Randwick, Sydney, NSW, Australia
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: Prof J.G. Colebatch, Institute of Neurological Sciences, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, Sydney, NSW 2031, Australia. Tel.: +612 9382 2407; Fax: +612 9382 2428; E-mail: j.colebatch@unsw.edu.au.
Abstract: BACKGROUND:The ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential is otolith-dependent and has been suggested to be a manifestation of the linear vestibulo-ocular reflex (L-VOR). A characteristic feature of the translational LVOR (t-LVOR) is its dependence on the distance of a target. OBJECTIVE:To assess if viewing distance affects amplitude and latency properties of the ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential (oVEMPs). METHODS:Bone- and air-conducted (BC and AC) stimuli were used to evoke oVEMPs in 10 healthy subjects. BC stimuli consisted of impulsive accelerations applied at the mastoids, AFz, Oz and Iz. AC stimuli consisted of 500 Hz tones delivered unilaterally to each ear. Target distances of 40 cm (near), 190 cm (intermediate) and 340 cm (far) were used for all stimuli. RESULTS:The largest amplitude oVEMP was obtained from Iz and the latency for AFz was shorter than for BC stimulation at other sites. We found no significant effect of target distance on oVEMP amplitudes for any of the stimuli used. There was a small but significant effect on latency with the nearest target having a longer latency (overall 12.4 ms vs 12.0 ms for the 2 more distant sites). CONCLUSIONS:Previously reported differences between latencies and stimulus sites for midline BC stimulation were confirmed. Target distance had no significant effect on oVEMP amplitude, which suggests it is not modified like other components of the t-LVOR.
Keywords: oVEMP, viewing distance, VOR
DOI: 10.3233/VES-200705
Journal: Journal of Vestibular Research, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 159-164, 2020
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl