Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: McGibbon, Chris A.a; c; * | Krebs, David E.b; c; d | Wolf, Steven L.g | Wayne, Peter M.c; f | Scarborough, Donna Moxleyb; c | Parker, Stephen W.d; e
Affiliations: [a] Institute of Biomedical Engineering, and Faculty of Kinesiology, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, NB, Canada E3B 5A3 | [b] Biomotion Laboratory, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA | [c] MGH Institute of Health Professions, Boston, MA 02129, USA | [d] Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA | [e] Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA | [f] New England School of Acupuncture, Watertown, MA 02472, USA | [g] Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: Chris A. McGibbon, PhD. Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of New Brunswick, 25 Dineen Drive, Fredericton, NB, Canada E3B 5A3. Tel.: +1 506 458 7098; Fax: +1 506 453 4827; E-mail: cmcgibb@unb.ca
Abstract: Tai Chi (TC) is a comparatively new intervention for peripheral vestibular hypofunction, which is often treated with vestibular rehabilitation (VR). We compared gaze stability (GZS), whole-body stability (WBS) and footfall stability (FFS) during locomotion among 26 people with vestibulopathy (VSP), randomized into two treatment arms (13 TC and 13 VR). Each intervention program was offered for 10 weeks. GZS improved more for VR than for TC, but WBS (and FFS) improved more for TC than for VR. There was a significant relationship between changes in GZS and WBS for the VR subjects (r = 0.60, p = 0.01), but not for TC subjects. There was a significant relationship between changes in WBS and FFS for both VR (r = 0.65, p < 0.01) and TC (r = 0.58, p = 0.02) groups; the relationship disappeared in the VR but not the TC group when controlling for GZS. These findings suggest that VR and TC both benefit patients with VSP but via differing mechanisms. Moreover, these data are the first to test the assumption that improving gaze control among patients with VSP perforce improves postural stability: it does not. We conclude that GZS is most improved in those who receive VR, but that TC improves WBS and FFS without improving GZS, suggesting patients with VSP can rely on non-gaze related mechanisms to improve postural control.
Keywords: vestibulopathy, gaze stability, whole body stability, Tai Chi, vestibular rehabilitation
DOI: 10.3233/VES-2004-14605
Journal: Journal of Vestibular Research, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 467-478, 2004
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl